Math Takes Two: A test for emergent mathematical reasoning in communication
arXiv AIArchived Apr 27, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.21935v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Although language models demonstrate remarkable proficiency on mathematical benchmarks, it remains unclear whether this reflects true mathematical reasoning or statistical pattern matching over learning formal syntax. Most existing evaluations rely on symbolic problems grounded in established mathematical conventions, limiting insight into the models' ability to construct abstract concepts from first principles. In this work, we propose Math Takes
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 30 Mar 2026]
Math Takes Two: A test for emergent mathematical reasoning in communication
Michael Cooper, Samuel Cooper
Although language models demonstrate remarkable proficiency on mathematical benchmarks, it remains unclear whether this reflects true mathematical reasoning or statistical pattern matching over learning formal syntax. Most existing evaluations rely on symbolic problems grounded in established mathematical conventions, limiting insight into the models' ability to construct abstract concepts from first principles. In this work, we propose Math Takes Two, a new benchmark designed to assess the emergence of mathematical reasoning through communication. Motivated by the hypothesis that mathematical cognition in humans co-evolved with the need for precise communication, our benchmark tests whether two agents, without prior mathematical knowledge, can develop a shared symbolic protocol to solve a visually grounded task where the use of a numerical system facilitates extrapolation. Unlike many current datasets, our benchmark eschews predefined mathematical language, instead requiring agents to discover latent structure and representations from scratch. Math Takes Two thus provides a novel lens through which to develop and evaluate models with emergent numerical reasoning capabilities.
Comments: Accepted at HCAIR workshop, ICLR 2026
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.21935 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2604.21935v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.21935
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Samuel Oliver Cooper [view email]
[v1] Mon, 30 Mar 2026 08:28:48 UTC (1,259 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.LG
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)