Automation-Exploit: A Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Adaptive Offensive Security with Digital Twin-Based Risk-Mitigated Exploitation
arXiv SecurityArchived Apr 27, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.22427v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The offensive security landscape is highly fragmented: enterprise platforms avoid memory-corruption vulnerabilities due to Denial of Service (DoS) risks, Automatic Exploit Generation (AEG) systems suffer from semantic blindness, and Large Language Model (LLM) agents face safety alignment filters and "Live Fire" execution hazards. We introduce Automation-Exploit, a fully autonomous Multi-Agent System (MAS) framework designed for adaptive offensive s
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 24 Apr 2026]
Automation-Exploit: A Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Adaptive Offensive Security with Digital Twin-Based Risk-Mitigated Exploitation
Biagio Andreucci, Arcangelo Castiglione
The offensive security landscape is highly fragmented: enterprise platforms avoid memory-corruption vulnerabilities due to Denial of Service (DoS) risks, Automatic Exploit Generation (AEG) systems suffer from semantic blindness, and Large Language Model (LLM) agents face safety alignment filters and "Live Fire" execution hazards. We introduce Automation-Exploit, a fully autonomous Multi-Agent System (MAS) framework designed for adaptive offensive security in complex black-box scenarios. It bridges the abstraction gap between reconnaissance and exploitation by autonomously exfiltrating executables and contextual intelligence across multiple protocols, using this data to fuel both logical and binary attack chains. The framework introduces an adaptive safety architecture to mitigate DoS risks. While it natively resolves logical and web-based vulnerabilities, it employs a conditional isomorphic validation for high-risk memory-corruption flaws: if the target binary is successfully exfiltrated, it dynamically instantiates a cross-platform digital twin. By enforcing strict state synchronization, including libc alignment and runtime file descriptor hooking, potentially destructive payloads are iteratively debugged in an isolated replica. This enables a highly risk-mitigated "one-shot" execution on the physical target. Empirical evaluations across eight scenarios, including undocumented zero-day environments to rule out LLM data contamination, validate the framework's architectural resilience, demonstrating its ability to prevent "live fire" crashes and execute risk-mitigated compromises on actual targets.
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.22427 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2604.22427v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.22427
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Biagio Andreucci [view email]
[v1] Fri, 24 Apr 2026 10:38:40 UTC (21,000 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)