Random Access Codes: Explicit Constructions, Optimality, and Classical-Quantum Gaps
arXiv QuantumArchived Apr 24, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.21274v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A random access code (RAC) encodes an $L$-bit string into a $k$-bit $(L>k)$ message from which any designated source bit can be recovered with high probability. Its quantum counterpart, a quantum random access code (QRAC), replaces the $k$-bit message with $k$ qubits. While upper bounds on the decoding success probability have long been studied in both classical and quantum settings, explicit constructions of optimal codes are known only in special
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Quantum Physics
[Submitted on 23 Apr 2026]
Random Access Codes: Explicit Constructions, Optimality, and Classical-Quantum Gaps
Ruho Kondo, Yuki Sato, Hiroshi Yano, Yota Maeda, Kosuke Ito, Naoki Yamamoto
A random access code (RAC) encodes an L-bit string into a k-bit (L>k) message from which any designated source bit can be recovered with high probability. Its quantum counterpart, a quantum random access code (QRAC), replaces the k-bit message with k qubits. While upper bounds on the decoding success probability have long been studied in both classical and quantum settings, explicit constructions of optimal codes are known only in special cases, even for classical RACs. In this paper, we develop a constructive framework for classical (L,k)-RACs under both average- and worst-case criteria. We show that optimal code design reduces to selecting 2^k points in \{0,1\}^L and [0,1]^L for the average- and worst-case criteria, respectively, so as to minimize a distance-like objective. This characterization yields explicit constructions for general (L,k). For k=L-1, we further obtain closed-form optimal encoders and decoders for both criteria, and show that the resulting classical (L,L-1)-RACs attain the corresponding proved upper bounds. We also show that these optimal classical codes induce (L,L-1)-QRACs that attain a conjectured upper bound on the decoding success probability. Numerical optimization suggests little difference between RACs and QRACs in the average-case setting, but a potentially large classical-quantum gap in the worst-case nonasymptotic regime.
Comments: 15 pages, 2 figures, 2 tables
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Information Theory (cs.IT)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.21274 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2604.21274v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.21274
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Ruho Kondo [view email]
[v1] Thu, 23 Apr 2026 04:36:05 UTC (118 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
quant-ph
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.IT
math
math.IT
References & Citations
INSPIRE HEP
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)