CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◌ Quantum Computing Apr 24, 2026

Random Access Codes: Explicit Constructions, Optimality, and Classical-Quantum Gaps

arXiv Quantum Archived Apr 24, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2604.21274v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A random access code (RAC) encodes an $L$-bit string into a $k$-bit $(L>k)$ message from which any designated source bit can be recovered with high probability. Its quantum counterpart, a quantum random access code (QRAC), replaces the $k$-bit message with $k$ qubits. While upper bounds on the decoding success probability have long been studied in both classical and quantum settings, explicit constructions of optimal codes are known only in special

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Quantum Physics [Submitted on 23 Apr 2026] Random Access Codes: Explicit Constructions, Optimality, and Classical-Quantum Gaps Ruho Kondo, Yuki Sato, Hiroshi Yano, Yota Maeda, Kosuke Ito, Naoki Yamamoto A random access code (RAC) encodes an L-bit string into a k-bit (L>k) message from which any designated source bit can be recovered with high probability. Its quantum counterpart, a quantum random access code (QRAC), replaces the k-bit message with k qubits. While upper bounds on the decoding success probability have long been studied in both classical and quantum settings, explicit constructions of optimal codes are known only in special cases, even for classical RACs. In this paper, we develop a constructive framework for classical (L,k)-RACs under both average- and worst-case criteria. We show that optimal code design reduces to selecting 2^k points in \{0,1\}^L and [0,1]^L for the average- and worst-case criteria, respectively, so as to minimize a distance-like objective. This characterization yields explicit constructions for general (L,k). For k=L-1, we further obtain closed-form optimal encoders and decoders for both criteria, and show that the resulting classical (L,L-1)-RACs attain the corresponding proved upper bounds. We also show that these optimal classical codes induce (L,L-1)-QRACs that attain a conjectured upper bound on the decoding success probability. Numerical optimization suggests little difference between RACs and QRACs in the average-case setting, but a potentially large classical-quantum gap in the worst-case nonasymptotic regime. Comments: 15 pages, 2 figures, 2 tables Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Information Theory (cs.IT) Cite as: arXiv:2604.21274 [quant-ph]   (or arXiv:2604.21274v1 [quant-ph] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.21274 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Ruho Kondo [view email] [v1] Thu, 23 Apr 2026 04:36:05 UTC (118 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: quant-ph < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-04 Change to browse by: cs cs.IT math math.IT References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Quantum
    Category
    ◌ Quantum Computing
    Published
    Apr 24, 2026
    Archived
    Apr 24, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗