CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Apr 24, 2026

Symbolic Grounding Reveals Representational Bottlenecks in Abstract Visual Reasoning

arXiv AI Archived Apr 24, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2604.21346v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision--language models (VLMs) often fail on abstract visual reasoning benchmarks such as Bongard problems, raising the question of whether the main bottleneck lies in reasoning or representation. We study this on Bongard-LOGO, a synthetic benchmark of abstract concept learning with ground-truth generative programs, by comparing end-to-end VLMs on raw images with large language models (LLMs) given symbolic inputs derived from those images. Using sy

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 23 Apr 2026] Symbolic Grounding Reveals Representational Bottlenecks in Abstract Visual Reasoning Mohit Vaishnav, Tanel Tammet Vision--language models (VLMs) often fail on abstract visual reasoning benchmarks such as Bongard problems, raising the question of whether the main bottleneck lies in reasoning or representation. We study this on Bongard-LOGO, a synthetic benchmark of abstract concept learning with ground-truth generative programs, by comparing end-to-end VLMs on raw images with large language models (LLMs) given symbolic inputs derived from those images. Using symbolic inputs as a diagnostic probe rather than a practical multimodal architecture, our \emph{Componential--Grammatical (C--G)} paradigm reformulates Bongard-LOGO as a symbolic reasoning task based on LOGO-style action programs or structured descriptions. LLMs achieve large and consistent gains, reaching mid--90s accuracy on Free-form problems, while a strong visual baseline remains near chance under matched task definitions. Ablations on input format, explicit concept prompts, and minimal visual grounding show that these factors matter much less than the shift from pixels to symbolic structure. These results identify representation as a key bottleneck in abstract visual reasoning and show how symbolic input can serve as a controlled diagnostic upper bound. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) Cite as: arXiv:2604.21346 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2604.21346v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.21346 Focus to learn more Journal reference: 30th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), 2026 Submission history From: Mohit Vaishnav [view email] [v1] Thu, 23 Apr 2026 07:03:48 UTC (452 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-04 Change to browse by: cs cs.CL cs.CV References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Apr 24, 2026
    Archived
    Apr 24, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗