AI Governance under Political Turnover: The Alignment Surface of Compliance Design
arXiv AIArchived Apr 24, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.21103v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Governments are increasingly interested in using AI to make administrative decisions cheaper, more scalable, and more consistent. But for probabilistic AI to be incorporated into public administration it must be embedded in a compliance layer that makes decisions reviewable, repeatable, and legally defensible. That layer can improve oversight by making departures from law easier to detect. But it can also create a stable approval boundary that poli
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 22 Apr 2026]
AI Governance under Political Turnover: The Alignment Surface of Compliance Design
Andrew J. Peterson
Governments are increasingly interested in using AI to make administrative decisions cheaper, more scalable, and more consistent. But for probabilistic AI to be incorporated into public administration it must be embedded in a compliance layer that makes decisions reviewable, repeatable, and legally defensible. That layer can improve oversight by making departures from law easier to detect. But it can also create a stable approval boundary that political successors learn to navigate while preserving the appearance of lawful administration. We develop a formal model in which institutions choose the scale of automation, the degree of codification, and safeguards on iterative use. The model shows when these systems become vulnerable to strategic use from within government, why reforms that initially improve oversight can later increase that vulnerability, and why expansions in AI use may be difficult to unwind. Making AI usable can thus make procedures easier for future governments to learn and exploit.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); General Economics (econ.GN)
ACM classes: J.1; K.4.1; J.7
Cite as: arXiv:2604.21103 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2604.21103v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.21103
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Andrew Peterson [view email]
[v1] Wed, 22 Apr 2026 21:42:50 UTC (611 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
econ
econ.GN
q-fin
q-fin.EC
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)