Physically Unclonable Functions for Secure IoT Authentication and Hardware-Anchored AI Model Integrity
arXiv SecurityArchived Apr 24, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.21188v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into Internet of Things (IoT) and edge computing systems has intensified the need for robust, hardware-rooted trust mechanisms capable of ensuring device authenticity and AI model integrity under strict resource and security constraints. This survey reviews and synthesizes existing literature on hardware-rooted trust mechanisms for AI-enabled IoT systems. It systematically examines and compares
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 23 Apr 2026]
Physically Unclonable Functions for Secure IoT Authentication and Hardware-Anchored AI Model Integrity
Maryam Taghi Zadeh, Mohsen Ahmadi
The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into Internet of Things (IoT) and edge computing systems has intensified the need for robust, hardware-rooted trust mechanisms capable of ensuring device authenticity and AI model integrity under strict resource and security constraints. This survey reviews and synthesizes existing literature on hardware-rooted trust mechanisms for AI-enabled IoT systems. It systematically examines and compares representative trust anchor mechanisms, including Trusted Platform Module (TPM)-based measurement and attestation, silicon and FPGA-based Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs), hybrid container-aware hardware roots of trust, and software-only security approaches. The analysis highlights how hardware-rooted solutions generally provide stronger protection against physical tampering and device cloning compared to software-only approaches, particularly in adversarial and physically exposed environments, while hybrid designs extend hardware trust into runtime and containerized environments commonly used in modern edge deployments. By evaluating trade-offs among security strength, scalability, cost, and deployment complexity, the study shows that PUF-based and hybrid trust anchors offer a promising balance for large-scale, AI-enabled IoT systems, whereas software-only trust mechanisms remain insufficient in adversarial and physically exposed settings. The presented comparison aims to clarify current design challenges and guide future development of trustworthy AI-enabled IoT platforms.
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.21188 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2604.21188v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.21188
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Maryam Taghi Zadeh - [view email]
[v1] Thu, 23 Apr 2026 01:06:42 UTC (2,088 KB)
Access Paper:
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)