CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◌ Quantum Computing Jul 11, 2025

Low Fidelity For QFT on IBM

Quantum Computing SE Archived Apr 23, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

I implemented a 5-qubit QFT circuit using Qiskit and performed quantum state tomography using an IBM backend. However, the reported process fidelity is only ~20%, which seems very low. I am trying to understand the potential reasons behind this. from qiskit import QuantumCircuit from qiskit_ibm_runtime import QiskitRuntimeService service = QiskitRuntimeService( channel='ibm_quantum_platform', instance='', token='', ) backend = service.backend("ibm_brisbane") def qft_circuit(n): qc = QuantumCircu

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Low Fidelity For QFT on IBM Ask Question Asked 9 months ago Modified today Viewed 226 times 2 I implemented a 5-qubit QFT circuit using Qiskit and performed quantum state tomography using an IBM backend. However, the reported process fidelity is only ~20%, which seems very low. I am trying to understand the potential reasons behind this. from qiskit import QuantumCircuit from qiskit_ibm_runtime import QiskitRuntimeService service = QiskitRuntimeService( channel='ibm_quantum_platform', instance='', token='', ) backend = service.backend("ibm_brisbane") def qft_circuit(n): qc = QuantumCircuit(n, n) for j in range(n): qc.h(j) for k in range(1, n - j): qc.cp(2 * 3.141592653589793 / 2**(k + 1), j + k, j) for i in range(n // 2): qc.swap(i, n - i - 1) return qc qft_20 = qft_circuit(5) qft_20.draw('mpl') qstexp1 = StateTomography(qft_20, backend=backend) qstdata1 = qstexp1.run(backend).block_for_results() # Print results display(qstdata1.analysis_results(dataframe=True)) ``` qiskitquantum-stateprogrammingqiskit-runtime Share Improve this question Follow edited Jul 13, 2025 at 15:36 asked Jul 11, 2025 at 18:04 physicino 1315 5 bronze badges Can you provide some reasoning as to why you say it "seems very low". And based on this analysis, what value were you expecting to get? –  diemilio Commented Jul 11, 2025 at 19:25 Which backend did you use? How did you perform tomography? –  Tristan Nemoz ♦ Commented Jul 12, 2025 at 15:34 Thank you for your responses. I actually expected with higher fidelity about 50 to 70 percent, as I run it with a noise model using Aersimulator of the same backend. Regarding the backed, I have tested on Brisbane and Fez. I do the tommograpphy using the following piece of code: qft_20 = qft_circuit(5) qft_20.draw('mpl') qstexp1 = StateTomography(qft_20, backend=backend) qstdata1 = qstexp1.run(backend).block_for_results() display(qstdata1.analysis_results(dataframe=True)) –  physicino Commented Jul 12, 2025 at 16:29 Can you post your full code within your post please? –  Tristan Nemoz ♦ Commented Jul 13, 2025 at 4:52 I edited the post with the full code. –  physicino Commented Jul 13, 2025 at 15:36 Add a comment 1 Answer Sorted by: Highest score (default) Date modified (newest first) Date created (oldest first) 0 You can get a bit pessimistic fidelity about 50 to 70 percent, just by running the QFT circuit without the tomagraphy. For tomagraph you need measuring circuits. For each qubit you must measure along the three Pauli axes Z, X and Y. That means three different measurement bases per qubit. If you have n qubits, every qubit can be measured in any of the three bases, so the total number of basis-combinations (i.e. distinct measurement circuits) is 3 n 3 𝑛 . Example for n =3 You need 3 3 =27 3 3 = 27 different circuits. In any basis a single qubit has two eigenstates (eigenvalues ± 1): Z basis: |0⟩,|1⟩ | 0 ⟩ , | 1 ⟩ X basis: |+⟩,|−⟩ | + ⟩ , | − ⟩ *Y basis: |+i⟩,|−i⟩ | + 𝑖 ⟩ , | − 𝑖 ⟩ Thus each basis provides 2 projectors, so there are 6 single-qubit projectors in total. When you measure n 𝑛 qubits simultaneously you get 2 n 2 𝑛 possible bit-string outcomes per circuit. Example for n = 3: 2 3 =8 2 3 = 8 different bit-strings per circuit. How many projectors do we need in the full POVM? The full, information-complete POVM is the tensor product of the six single-qubit projectors over all qubits, giving 6 n 6 𝑛 multi-qubit projectors. With n = 3 we need 6 3 =216 6 3 = 216 projectors. There will be a lot of SPAM errors and shotnoise. For reference the following qiskit circuit shows a fidelity of 0.65 without the Tomography. from qiskit import QuantumCircuit from qiskit.quantum_info import Statevector, state_fidelity, Operator, process_fidelity, DensityMatrix from qiskit_aer import AerSimulator from qiskit_aer.noise import NoiseModel, depolarizing_error, ReadoutError import numpy as np # --- QFT‑circuit en ideale fideliteit --- def qft_circuit(n): qc = QuantumCircuit(n) for j in range(n): qc.h(j) for k in range(1, n - j): qc.cp(2 * np.pi / 2**(k + 1), j + k, j) for i in range(n // 2): qc.swap(i, n - i - 1) return qc n = 5 qc = qft_circuit(n) # Ideale staatvector en fideliteit statevector = Statevector.from_instruction(qc) ideal = np.ones(2**n) / np.sqrt(2**n) print(statevector, "Statevector") print("State fidelity (ideal):", state_fidelity(statevector, ideal)) print("Process fidelity (ideal):", process_fidelity(Operator(qc), Operator(qc))) # --- Ruis­model (depolarisatie + meetfouten) --- noise_model = NoiseModel() error_1q = depolarizing_error(0.005, 1) # 0.5% 1‑qubit depolariserende fout error_2q = depolarizing_error(0.03, 2) # 3% 2‑qubit depolariserende fout noise_model.add_all_qubit_quantum_error(error_1q, ['u1','u2','u3','rx','ry','rz','h','t','sx','x','y','z','s','sdg']) noise_model.add_all_qubit_quantum_error(error_2q, ['cx','cp','swap']) readout_error = ReadoutError([[0.9, 0.1], [0.1, 0.9]]) # 10% meetfout noise_model.add_all_qubit_readout_error(readout_error) sim = AerSimulator(noise_model=noise_model) # Ruis­simulatie met density matrix qc_dm = qc.copy() qc_dm.save_density_matrix() job = sim.run(qc_dm) result = job.result() rho = result.data(qc_dm)['density_matrix'] print("Noisy fidelity (density matrix):", state_fidelity(DensityMatrix(rho), ideal)) Output: State fidelity (ideal): 0.9999999999999991 Process fidelity (ideal): 0.9999999999999996 Noisy fidelity (density matrix): 0.6887759418623769 Share Improve this answer Follow edited Jul 27, 2025 at 6:52 answered Jul 25, 2025 at 16:31 Bram 1,5418 8 silver badges 10 10 bronze badges Thank you so much for your response. I think you have run your circuit on a simulator, which also, if you do tomography on a simulator with the noise data from a real device, you can get the same or even better results. –  physicino Commented Jul 27, 2025 at 16:08 Add a comment Your Answer Sign up or log in Sign up using Google Sign up using Email and Password Post as a guest Name Email Required, but never shown Post Your Answer By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy. Start asking to get answers Find the answer to your question by asking. Ask question Explore related questions qiskitquantum-stateprogrammingqiskit-runtime See similar questions with these tags. The Overflow Blog How to get multiple agents to play nice at scale We still need developer communities Related 3 Implementing QFT 4 TranspilerError: 'The input circuit None is not scheduled' 1 Set IBMQ to qiskit-ibm-runtime 3 Why do the same circult yields very different results from different IBM backends? 1 issues with running code on IBM QPU 0 How to perform quantum state tomography with Qiskit after the deprecation of backend.run()? 0 Not able to connect to the IBM quantum platform: Hot Network Questions Why are gallons and cubic inches both used to measure liquid volume? What is the historical origin of this redundancy? How should I contextualise group theory results? Struggling with understanding generalised coordinates Calculating the radius of a semicircle inscribed in a triangle Why do so many high school students struggle with the quadratic formula, and what’s a better way to teach it? Plot a domain in 3D with TikZ for a triple integral Why did the referee keep the defender 6 feet away from the baseline? What are the main differences between Hebrew and Talmudic Aramaic? Use a magnetic field to insolate spacecraft from heat of the reentry plasma Why is my filter list invalid in Adblock Plus, despite working in uBlock Origin? Natural transformation between endo-functors of the category of modules Material-specific reflection mapping as if it's the world What did Jesus mean by we will do greater things than he did LACP vs ACTIVE_BACKUP Aligning text within a table cell so that it is centered horizontally and vertically How can I easily get an approximate measurement of soil bearing strength without buying equipment or hiring contractors? Non-Inverting Amplifier with Midpoint Biasing What is this opening called and what should I do to counter it as black? What focus is used for spells that do not specify they "count as a [your class] spell for you"? How did Rocky manage to freeze xenon into xenonite? Broken name resolution and connection on wireguard interface when devices are on LAN What is proper technique to attach armored ground wire to grounding clamp? Solvability of Knapsack variant How should I compare a 4-point ordinal scale between two independent groups? Question feed By continuing to use this website, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. By exiting this window, default cookies will be accepted. To reject cookies, select an option from below. Customize settings Cookie Consent Preference Center When you visit any of our websites, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences, or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and manage your preferences. Please note, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Cookie Policy Accept all cookies Manage Consent Preferences Strictly Necessary Cookies Always Active These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information. Targeting Cookies Targeting Cookies These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you and may be set through our site by us or by our advertising partners. They may be used to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant advertising on our site or on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. Performance Cookies Performance Cookies These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance. Functional Cookies Functional Cookies These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then some or all of these services may not function properly. Cookie List Clear checkbox label label Apply Cancel Consent Leg.Interest checkbox label label checkbox label label checkbox label label Necessary cookies only Confirm My Choices
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    Quantum Computing SE
    Category
    ◌ Quantum Computing
    Published
    Jul 11, 2025
    Archived
    Apr 23, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗