Co-Designing Error Mitigation and Error Detection for Logical Qubits
arXiv QuantumArchived Apr 23, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.19871v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Near-term quantum workloads demand error management, yet the two lightest-weight techniques, Quantum Error Detection (QED) and Probabilistic Error Cancellation (PEC), have complementary cost profiles whose joint architectural design space remains unexplored. QED encodes logical qubits and discards error-flagged runs, filtering noise with low qubit overhead but leaving residual errors; PEC can correct these in software, but at exponential cost in no
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Quantum Physics
[Submitted on 21 Apr 2026]
Co-Designing Error Mitigation and Error Detection for Logical Qubits
Rohan S. Kumar, Takahiro Tsunoda, Sophia H. Xue, Dantong Li, Robert J. Schoelkopf, Yongshan Ding
Near-term quantum workloads demand error management, yet the two lightest-weight techniques, Quantum Error Detection (QED) and Probabilistic Error Cancellation (PEC), have complementary cost profiles whose joint architectural design space remains unexplored. QED encodes logical qubits and discards error-flagged runs, filtering noise with low qubit overhead but leaving residual errors; PEC can correct these in software, but at exponential cost in noise strength. If QED efficiently reduces per-gate noise, PEC's cost savings can outweigh QED's discard overhead; realizing this, however, requires solving two system-level design challenges.
First, the \textit{QED interval} -- how often detection cycles are inserted -- is a tunable architectural parameter governing the cost-accuracy tradeoff. We derive an efficiency condition and show that the canonical one-cycle-per-gate frequency does not achieve break-even in any code we evaluate, while optimized intervals on high-rate Iceberg codes do. Second, we discover that naive PEC+QED integration \textit{degrades} accuracy below the QED-only baseline. The root cause is a transient error profile in the first detection cycle that corrupts PEC's noise model. We develop \textit{steady-state extraction}, a co-designed characterization protocol that isolates steady-state error behavior, reducing estimation bias by up to 10.2\times. On a [[6,4,2]] Iceberg code running QAOA (p{=}4--8) with a fixed shot budget, PEC+QED achieves 2--11\times lower absolute error and up to 31\times lower MSE versus PEC on physical qubits, with per-interval savings compounding over interval depth.
Comments: 15 pages, 9 figures, 2 tables
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Hardware Architecture (cs.AR)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.19871 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2604.19871v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.19871
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Rohan Kumar [view email]
[v1] Tue, 21 Apr 2026 18:00:02 UTC (3,372 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
quant-ph
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AR
References & Citations
INSPIRE HEP
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)