Hidden Reliability Risks in Large Language Models: Systematic Identification of Precision-Induced Output Disagreements
arXiv AIArchived Apr 23, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.19790v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed under diverse numerical precision configurations, including standard floating-point formats (e.g., bfloat16 and float16) and quantized integer formats (e.g., int16 and int8), to meet efficiency and resource constraints. However, minor inconsistencies between LLMs of different precisions are difficult to detect and are often overlooked by existing evaluation methods. In this paper, we present Pr
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 2 Apr 2026]
Hidden Reliability Risks in Large Language Models: Systematic Identification of Precision-Induced Output Disagreements
Yifei Wang, Tianlin Li, Xiaohan Zhang, Xiaoyu Zhang, Wei Ma, Mingfei Cheng, Li Pan
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed under diverse numerical precision configurations, including standard floating-point formats (e.g., bfloat16 and float16) and quantized integer formats (e.g., int16 and int8), to meet efficiency and resource constraints. However, minor inconsistencies between LLMs of different precisions are difficult to detect and are often overlooked by existing evaluation methods. In this paper, we present PrecisionDiff, an automated differential testing framework for systematically detecting precision-induced behavioral disagreements in LLMs. PrecisionDiff generates precision-sensitive test inputs and performs cross-precision comparative analysis to uncover subtle divergences that remain hidden under conventional testing strategies. To demonstrate its practical significance, we instantiate PrecisionDiff on the alignment verification task, where precision-induced disagreements manifest as jailbreak divergence-inputs that are rejected under one precision may produce harmful responses under another. Experimental results show that such behavioral disagreements are widespread across multiple open-source aligned LLMs and precision settings, and that PrecisionDiff significantly outperforms vanilla testing methods in detecting these issues. Our work enables automated precision-sensitive test generation, facilitating effective pre-deployment evaluation and improving precision robustness during training.
Comments: 12 pages, 5 figures
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
ACM classes: I.2.7; K.6.5
Cite as: arXiv:2604.19790 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2604.19790v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.19790
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Yifei Wang [view email]
[v1] Thu, 2 Apr 2026 03:38:47 UTC (1,749 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.LG
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)