CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Apr 23, 2026

Hidden Reliability Risks in Large Language Models: Systematic Identification of Precision-Induced Output Disagreements

arXiv AI Archived Apr 23, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2604.19790v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed under diverse numerical precision configurations, including standard floating-point formats (e.g., bfloat16 and float16) and quantized integer formats (e.g., int16 and int8), to meet efficiency and resource constraints. However, minor inconsistencies between LLMs of different precisions are difficult to detect and are often overlooked by existing evaluation methods. In this paper, we present Pr

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 2 Apr 2026] Hidden Reliability Risks in Large Language Models: Systematic Identification of Precision-Induced Output Disagreements Yifei Wang, Tianlin Li, Xiaohan Zhang, Xiaoyu Zhang, Wei Ma, Mingfei Cheng, Li Pan Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed under diverse numerical precision configurations, including standard floating-point formats (e.g., bfloat16 and float16) and quantized integer formats (e.g., int16 and int8), to meet efficiency and resource constraints. However, minor inconsistencies between LLMs of different precisions are difficult to detect and are often overlooked by existing evaluation methods. In this paper, we present PrecisionDiff, an automated differential testing framework for systematically detecting precision-induced behavioral disagreements in LLMs. PrecisionDiff generates precision-sensitive test inputs and performs cross-precision comparative analysis to uncover subtle divergences that remain hidden under conventional testing strategies. To demonstrate its practical significance, we instantiate PrecisionDiff on the alignment verification task, where precision-induced disagreements manifest as jailbreak divergence-inputs that are rejected under one precision may produce harmful responses under another. Experimental results show that such behavioral disagreements are widespread across multiple open-source aligned LLMs and precision settings, and that PrecisionDiff significantly outperforms vanilla testing methods in detecting these issues. Our work enables automated precision-sensitive test generation, facilitating effective pre-deployment evaluation and improving precision robustness during training. Comments: 12 pages, 5 figures Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG) ACM classes: I.2.7; K.6.5 Cite as: arXiv:2604.19790 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2604.19790v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.19790 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Yifei Wang [view email] [v1] Thu, 2 Apr 2026 03:38:47 UTC (1,749 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-04 Change to browse by: cs cs.LG References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Apr 23, 2026
    Archived
    Apr 23, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗