From Data to Theory: Autonomous Large Language Model Agents for Materials Science
arXiv AIArchived Apr 23, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.19789v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present an autonomous large language model (LLM) agent for end-to-end, data-driven materials theory development. The model can choose an equation form, generate and run its own code, and test how well the theory matches the data without human intervention. The framework combines step-by-step reasoning with expert-supplied tools, allowing the agent to adjust its approach as needed while keeping a clear record of its decisions. For well-establishe
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 1 Apr 2026]
From Data to Theory: Autonomous Large Language Model Agents for Materials Science
Samuel Onimpa Alfred, Veera Sundararaghavan
We present an autonomous large language model (LLM) agent for end-to-end, data-driven materials theory development. The model can choose an equation form, generate and run its own code, and test how well the theory matches the data without human intervention. The framework combines step-by-step reasoning with expert-supplied tools, allowing the agent to adjust its approach as needed while keeping a clear record of its decisions. For well-established materials relationships such as the Hall-Petch equation and Paris law, the agent correctly identifies the governing equation and makes reliable predictions on new datasets. For more specialized relationships, such as Kuhn's equation for the HOMO-LUMO gap of conjugated molecules as a function of length, performance depends more strongly on the underlying model, with GPT-5 showing better recovery of the correct equation. Beyond known theories, the agent can also suggest new predictive relationships, illustrated here by a strain-dependent law for changes in the HOMO-LUMO gap. At the same time, the results show that careful validation remains essential, because the agent can still return incorrect, incomplete, or inconsistent equations even when the numerical fit appears strong. Overall, these results highlight both the promise and the current limitations of autonomous LLM agents for AI-assisted scientific modeling and discovery.
Comments: 24 pages, 5 figures
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Materials Science (cond-mat.mtrl-sci)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.19789 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2604.19789v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.19789
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Samuel Alfred [view email]
[v1] Wed, 1 Apr 2026 18:10:40 UTC (509 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cond-mat
cond-mat.mtrl-sci
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)