CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Apr 23, 2026

From Data to Theory: Autonomous Large Language Model Agents for Materials Science

arXiv AI Archived Apr 23, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2604.19789v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present an autonomous large language model (LLM) agent for end-to-end, data-driven materials theory development. The model can choose an equation form, generate and run its own code, and test how well the theory matches the data without human intervention. The framework combines step-by-step reasoning with expert-supplied tools, allowing the agent to adjust its approach as needed while keeping a clear record of its decisions. For well-establishe

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 1 Apr 2026] From Data to Theory: Autonomous Large Language Model Agents for Materials Science Samuel Onimpa Alfred, Veera Sundararaghavan We present an autonomous large language model (LLM) agent for end-to-end, data-driven materials theory development. The model can choose an equation form, generate and run its own code, and test how well the theory matches the data without human intervention. The framework combines step-by-step reasoning with expert-supplied tools, allowing the agent to adjust its approach as needed while keeping a clear record of its decisions. For well-established materials relationships such as the Hall-Petch equation and Paris law, the agent correctly identifies the governing equation and makes reliable predictions on new datasets. For more specialized relationships, such as Kuhn's equation for the HOMO-LUMO gap of conjugated molecules as a function of length, performance depends more strongly on the underlying model, with GPT-5 showing better recovery of the correct equation. Beyond known theories, the agent can also suggest new predictive relationships, illustrated here by a strain-dependent law for changes in the HOMO-LUMO gap. At the same time, the results show that careful validation remains essential, because the agent can still return incorrect, incomplete, or inconsistent equations even when the numerical fit appears strong. Overall, these results highlight both the promise and the current limitations of autonomous LLM agents for AI-assisted scientific modeling and discovery. Comments: 24 pages, 5 figures Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Materials Science (cond-mat.mtrl-sci) Cite as: arXiv:2604.19789 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2604.19789v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.19789 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Samuel Alfred [view email] [v1] Wed, 1 Apr 2026 18:10:40 UTC (509 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-04 Change to browse by: cond-mat cond-mat.mtrl-sci cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Apr 23, 2026
    Archived
    Apr 23, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗