CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Apr 23, 2026

Auto-ART: Structured Literature Synthesis and Automated Adversarial Robustness Testing

arXiv Security Archived Apr 23, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2604.20704v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Adversarial robustness evaluation underpins every claim of trustworthy ML deployment, yet the field suffers from fragmented protocols and undetected gradient masking. We make two contributions. (1) Structured synthesis. We analyze nine peer-reviewed corpus sources (2020--2026) through seven complementary protocols, producing the first end-to-end structured analysis of the field's consensus and unresolved challenges. (2) Auto-ART framework. We intro

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 22 Apr 2026] Auto-ART: Structured Literature Synthesis and Automated Adversarial Robustness Testing Abhijit Talluri Adversarial robustness evaluation underpins every claim of trustworthy ML deployment, yet the field suffers from fragmented protocols and undetected gradient masking. We make two contributions. (1) Structured synthesis. We analyze nine peer-reviewed corpus sources (2020--2026) through seven complementary protocols, producing the first end-to-end structured analysis of the field's consensus and unresolved challenges. (2) Auto-ART framework. We introduce Auto-ART, an open-source framework that operationalizes identified gaps: 50+ attacks, 28 defense modules, the Robustness Diagnostic Index (RDI), and gradient-masking detection. It supports multi-norm evaluation (l1/l2/linf/semantic/spatial) and compliance mapping to NIST AI RMF, OWASP LLM Top 10, and the EU AI Act. Empirical validation on RobustBench demonstrates that Auto-ART's pre-screening identifies gradient masking in 92% of flagged cases, and RDI rankings correlate highly with full AutoAttack. Multi-norm evaluation exposes a 23.5 pp gap between average and worst-case robustness on state-of-the-art models. No prior work combines such structured meta-scientific analysis with an executable evaluation framework bridging literature gaps into engineering. Comments: NeurIPS 2026 Evaluations and Datasets Track Submission Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2604.20704 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2604.20704v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.20704 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Abhijit Talluri [view email] [v1] Wed, 22 Apr 2026 15:46:11 UTC (48 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-04 Change to browse by: cs cs.LG References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Apr 23, 2026
    Archived
    Apr 23, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗