CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Apr 23, 2026

Taint-Style Vulnerability Detection and Confirmation for Node.js Packages Using LLM Agent Reasoning

arXiv Security Archived Apr 23, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2604.20179v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapidly evolving Node$.$js ecosystem currently includes millions of packages and is a critical part of modern software supply chains, making vulnerability detection of Node$.$js packages increasingly important. However, traditional program analysis struggles in this setting because of dynamic JavaScript features and the large number of package dependencies. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) and the emerging paradigm of LLM-based a

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 22 Apr 2026] Taint-Style Vulnerability Detection and Confirmation for Node.js Packages Using LLM Agent Reasoning Ronghao Ni, Mihai Christodorescu, Limin Jia The rapidly evolving Node.js ecosystem currently includes millions of packages and is a critical part of modern software supply chains, making vulnerability detection of Node.js packages increasingly important. However, traditional program analysis struggles in this setting because of dynamic JavaScript features and the large number of package dependencies. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) and the emerging paradigm of LLM-based agents offer an alternative to handcrafted program models. This raises the question of whether an LLM-centric, tool-augmented approach can effectively detect and confirm taint-style vulnerabilities (e.g., arbitrary command injection) in Node.js packages. We implement LLMVD.js, a multi-stage agent pipeline to scan code, propose vulnerabilities, generate proof-of-concept exploits, and validate them through lightweight execution oracles; and systematically evaluate its effectiveness in taint-style vulnerability detection and confirmation in Node.js packages without dedicated static/dynamic analysis engines for path derivation. For packages from public benchmarks, LLMVD.js confirms 84% of the vulnerabilities, compared to less than 22% for prior program analysis tools. It also outperforms a prior LLM-program-analysis hybrid approach while requiring neither vulnerability annotations nor prior vulnerability reports. When evaluated on a set of 260 recently released packages (without vulnerability groundtruth information), traditional tools produce validated exploits for few (\leq 2) packages, while LLMVD.js generates validated exploits for 36 packages. Comments: 19 pages, 6 figures Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Software Engineering (cs.SE) Cite as: arXiv:2604.20179 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2604.20179v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.20179 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Ronghao Ni [view email] [v1] Wed, 22 Apr 2026 04:50:48 UTC (302 KB) Access Paper: view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-04 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI cs.SE References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Apr 23, 2026
    Archived
    Apr 23, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗