"We are currently clean on OPSEC": Why JD Can't Encrypt
arXiv SecurityArchived Apr 22, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.19711v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We analyse the 2025 Signalgate leak of sensitive US military information by the Trump administration, addressing why confidentiality was violated (messages leaked to the press) in spite of encryption (Signal), to deepen the socio-technical considerations when designing and deploying encryption. First, we use applied pi-calculus to formally model the boutique secure facility setup requested by the US Defence Secretary, to prove that a leak would not
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 21 Apr 2026]
"We are currently clean on OPSEC": Why JD Can't Encrypt
Maurice Chiodo, Toni Erskine, Dennis Müller, James G. Wright
We analyse the 2025 Signalgate leak of sensitive US military information by the Trump administration, addressing why confidentiality was violated (messages leaked to the press) in spite of encryption (Signal), to deepen the socio-technical considerations when designing and deploying encryption. First, we use applied pi-calculus to formally model the boutique secure facility setup requested by the US Defence Secretary, to prove that a leak would not be prevented. We then examine how using a secure channel might still not give overall information security, as, in this case, power imbalances between personnel and officials led to the application of cryptography that compromised their operational security. We look at how cryptographic tools may have instilled a false sense of security, and led officials to "overshare". We then apply this analysis to the Trump administration's general desire to burn through political, legal, and now technical process, and demonstrate geopolitical harms that may arise from such ineffective use of cryptography in a brief use case. We conclude that, even with advancements in usability of cryptographic tools, genuine message security is still out of reach of the "average user".
Comments: 31 pages
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
ACM classes: K.6.5; K.4.1; K.4.2; K.7.4
Cite as: arXiv:2604.19711 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2604.19711v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.19711
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Maurice Chiodo [view email]
[v1] Tue, 21 Apr 2026 17:34:53 UTC (28 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CY
cs.HC
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)