Semantic Consensus: Process-Aware Conflict Detection and Resolution for Enterprise Multi-Agent LLM Systems
arXiv AIArchived Apr 21, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.16339v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent large language model (LLM) systems are rapidly emerging as the dominant architecture for enterprise AI automation, yet production deployments exhibit failure rates between 41% and 86.7%, with nearly 79% of failures originating from specification and coordination issues rather than model capability limitations. This paper identifies Semantic Intent Divergence--the phenomenon whereby cooperating LLM agents develop inconsistent interpretat
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 13 Mar 2026]
Semantic Consensus: Process-Aware Conflict Detection and Resolution for Enterprise Multi-Agent LLM Systems
Vivek Acharya
Multi-agent large language model (LLM) systems are rapidly emerging as the dominant architecture for enterprise AI automation, yet production deployments exhibit failure rates between 41% and 86.7%, with nearly 79% of failures originating from specification and coordination issues rather than model capability limitations. This paper identifies Semantic Intent Divergence--the phenomenon whereby cooperating LLM agents develop inconsistent interpretations of shared objectives due to siloed context and absent process models--as a primary yet formally unaddressed root cause of multi-agent failure in enterprise settings. We propose the Semantic Consensus Framework (SCF), a process-aware middleware comprising six components: a Process Context Layer for shared operational semantics, a Semantic Intent Graph for formal intent representation, a Conflict Detection Engine for real-time identification of contradictory, contention-based, and causally invalid intent combinations, a Consensus Resolution Protocol using a policy--authority--temporal hierarchy, a Drift Monitor for detecting gradual semantic divergence, and a Process-Aware Governance Integration layer for organizational policy enforcement. Evaluation across 600 runs spanning three multi-agent frameworks (AutoGen, CrewAI, LangGraph) and four enterprise scenarios demonstrates that SCF is the only approach to achieve 100% workflow completion--compared to 25.1% for the next-best baseline--while detecting 65.2% of semantic conflicts with 27.9% precision and providing complete governance audit trails. The framework is protocol-agnostic and compatible with MCP and A2A communication standards.
Comments: 18 pages, 4 figures, 4 tables
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA); Software Engineering (cs.SE)
ACM classes: I.2.11; H.4.1
Cite as: arXiv:2604.16339 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2604.16339v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.16339
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Vivek Acharya [view email]
[v1] Fri, 13 Mar 2026 14:55:38 UTC (19 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.MA
cs.SE
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)