Magnitude Is All You Need? Rethinking Phase in Quantum Encoding of Complex SAR Data
arXiv QuantumArchived Apr 17, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.14229v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data is inherently complex-valued, while quantum machine learning (QML) models naturally operate in complex Hilbert spaces. This apparent alignment suggests that incorporating both magnitude and phase information into quantum encoding should improve performance in SAR Automatic Target Recognition (ATR). In this work, we systematically evaluate this assumption by comparing five quantum encoding strategies: magnitude-on
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Quantum Physics
[Submitted on 14 Apr 2026]
Magnitude Is All You Need? Rethinking Phase in Quantum Encoding of Complex SAR Data
Sakthi Prabhu Gunasekar, Prasanna Kumar R
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data is inherently complex-valued, while quantum machine learning (QML) models naturally operate in complex Hilbert spaces. This apparent alignment suggests that incorporating both magnitude and phase information into quantum encoding should improve performance in SAR Automatic Target Recognition (ATR). In this work, we systematically evaluate this assumption by comparing five quantum encoding strategies: magnitude-only, joint complex, I/Q-based, preprocessed phase, and pure quantum, under a unified experimental framework on the MSTAR benchmark dataset.
Contrary to expectation, we observe a consistent pattern: in hybrid quantum-classical architectures, magnitude-only encoding outperforms all complex-valued strategies, achieving 99.57% accuracy on a 3-class task and 71.19% on an 8-class task, while phase-aware methods provide negligible (~0%) or negative improvements. In contrast, in purely quantum architectures with only 184-224 trainable parameters and no classical components, phase information becomes essential, contributing up to 21.65% improvement in accuracy.
These results reveal that the utility of phase information is not inherent to the data, but depends critically on the model architecture. Hybrid models rely on classical components that compensate for missing phase information, whereas purely quantum models require phase to construct discriminative representations. Our findings provide practical design guidelines for encoding complex-valued data in QML and highlight the importance of encoding-architecture co-design in the NISQ era.
Comments: 8 pages, 4 figures. Under review for IEEE QCE 2026
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Image and Video Processing (eess.IV)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.14229 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2604.14229v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.14229
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Sakthi Prabhu Gunasekar [view email]
[v1] Tue, 14 Apr 2026 18:03:47 UTC (2,983 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
quant-ph
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
cs.LG
eess
eess.IV
References & Citations
INSPIRE HEP
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)