Weight Patching: Toward Source-Level Mechanistic Localization in LLMs
arXiv AIArchived Apr 17, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.13694v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mechanistic interpretability seeks to localize model behavior to the internal components that causally realize it. Prior work has advanced activation-space localization and causal tracing, but modules that appear important in activation space may merely aggregate or amplify upstream signals rather than encode the target capability in their own parameters. To address this gap, we propose Weight Patching, a parameter-space intervention method for sou
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 15 Apr 2026]
Weight Patching: Toward Source-Level Mechanistic Localization in LLMs
Chenghao Sun, Chengsheng Zhang, Guanzheng Qin, Rui Dai, Xinmei Tian
Mechanistic interpretability seeks to localize model behavior to the internal components that causally realize it. Prior work has advanced activation-space localization and causal tracing, but modules that appear important in activation space may merely aggregate or amplify upstream signals rather than encode the target capability in their own parameters. To address this gap, we propose Weight Patching, a parameter-space intervention method for source-oriented analysis in paired same-architecture models that differ in how strongly they express a target capability under the inputs of interest. Given a base model and a behavior-specialized counterpart, Weight Patching replaces selected module weights from the specialized model into the base model under a fixed input. We instantiate the method on instruction following and introduce a framework centered on a vector-anchor behavioral interface that provides a shared internal criterion for whether a task-relevant control state has been formed or recovered in open-ended generation. Under this framework, the analysis reveals a hierarchy from shallow candidate source-side carriers to aggregation and routing modules, and further to downstream execution circuits. The recovered component scores can also guide mechanism-aware model merging, improving selective fusion across the evaluated expert combinations and providing additional external validation.
Comments: 36 pages. Submitted to IEEE for possible publication
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.13694 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2604.13694v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.13694
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Chenghao Sun [view email]
[v1] Wed, 15 Apr 2026 10:21:38 UTC (6,569 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)