CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Apr 17, 2026

Optimizing Earth Observation Satellite Schedules under Unknown Operational Constraints: An Active Constraint Acquisition Approach

arXiv AI Archived Apr 17, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2604.13283v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Earth Observation (EO) satellite scheduling (deciding which imaging tasks to perform and when) is a well-studied combinatorial optimization problem. Existing methods typically assume that the operational constraint model is fully specified in advance. In practice, however, constraints governing separation between observations, power budgets, and thermal limits are often embedded in engineering artefacts or high-fidelity simulators rather than in ex

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 14 Apr 2026] Optimizing Earth Observation Satellite Schedules under Unknown Operational Constraints: An Active Constraint Acquisition Approach Mohamed-Bachir Belaid Earth Observation (EO) satellite scheduling (deciding which imaging tasks to perform and when) is a well-studied combinatorial optimization problem. Existing methods typically assume that the operational constraint model is fully specified in advance. In practice, however, constraints governing separation between observations, power budgets, and thermal limits are often embedded in engineering artefacts or high-fidelity simulators rather than in explicit mathematical models. We study EO scheduling under \emph{unknown constraints}: the objective is known, but feasibility must be learned interactively from a binary oracle. Working with a simplified model restricted to pairwise separation and global capacity constraints, we introduce Conservative Constraint Acquisition~(CCA), a domain-specific procedure designed to identify justified constraints efficiently in practice while limiting unnecessary tightening of the learned model. Embedded in the \textsc{Learn\&Optimize} framework, CCA supports an interactive search process that alternates optimization under a learned constraint model with targeted oracle queries. On synthetic instances with up to 50~tasks and dense constraint networks, L\&O improves over a no-knowledge greedy baseline and uses far fewer main oracle queries than a two-phase acquire-then-solve baseline (FAO). For n\leq 30, the average gap drops from 65--68\% (Priority Greedy) to 17.7--35.8\% using L\&O. At n{=}50, where the CP-SAT reference is the best feasible solution found in 120~s, L\&O improves on FAO on average (17.9\% vs.\ 20.3\%) while using 21.3 main queries instead of 100 and about 5\times less execution time. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2604.13283 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2604.13283v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.13283 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Mohamed-Bachir Belaid [view email] [v1] Tue, 14 Apr 2026 20:19:28 UTC (68 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-04 Change to browse by: cs cs.LG References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Apr 17, 2026
    Archived
    Apr 17, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗