CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Apr 17, 2026

Numerical Instability and Chaos: Quantifying the Unpredictability of Large Language Models

arXiv AI Archived Apr 17, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2604.13206v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into agentic workflows, their unpredictability stemming from numerical instability has emerged as a critical reliability issue. While recent studies have demonstrated the significant downstream effects of these instabilities, the root causes and underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. In this paper, we present a rigorous analysis of how unpredictability is rooted in the finite nume

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 14 Apr 2026] Numerical Instability and Chaos: Quantifying the Unpredictability of Large Language Models Chashi Mahiul Islam, Alan Villarreal, Mao Nishino, Shaeke Salman, Xiuwen Liu As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into agentic workflows, their unpredictability stemming from numerical instability has emerged as a critical reliability issue. While recent studies have demonstrated the significant downstream effects of these instabilities, the root causes and underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. In this paper, we present a rigorous analysis of how unpredictability is rooted in the finite numerical precision of floating-point representations, tracking how rounding errors propagate, amplify, or dissipate through Transformer computation layers. Specifically, we identify a chaotic "avalanche effect" in the early layers, where minor perturbations trigger binary outcomes: either rapid amplification or complete attenuation. Beyond specific error instances, we demonstrate that LLMs exhibit universal, scale-dependent chaotic behaviors characterized by three distinct regimes: 1) a stable regime, where perturbations fall below an input-dependent threshold and vanish, resulting in constant outputs; 2) a chaotic regime, where rounding errors dominate and drive output divergence; and 3) a signal-dominated regime, where true input variations override numerical noise. We validate these findings extensively across multiple datasets and model architectures. Comments: 8 pages, 9 figures Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Numerical Analysis (math.NA) Cite as: arXiv:2604.13206 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2604.13206v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.13206 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Chashi Mahiul Islam [view email] [v1] Tue, 14 Apr 2026 18:26:38 UTC (3,242 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-04 Change to browse by: cs cs.LG cs.NA math math.NA References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Apr 17, 2026
    Archived
    Apr 17, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗