Numerical Instability and Chaos: Quantifying the Unpredictability of Large Language Models
arXiv AIArchived Apr 17, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.13206v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into agentic workflows, their unpredictability stemming from numerical instability has emerged as a critical reliability issue. While recent studies have demonstrated the significant downstream effects of these instabilities, the root causes and underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. In this paper, we present a rigorous analysis of how unpredictability is rooted in the finite nume
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 14 Apr 2026]
Numerical Instability and Chaos: Quantifying the Unpredictability of Large Language Models
Chashi Mahiul Islam, Alan Villarreal, Mao Nishino, Shaeke Salman, Xiuwen Liu
As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into agentic workflows, their unpredictability stemming from numerical instability has emerged as a critical reliability issue. While recent studies have demonstrated the significant downstream effects of these instabilities, the root causes and underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. In this paper, we present a rigorous analysis of how unpredictability is rooted in the finite numerical precision of floating-point representations, tracking how rounding errors propagate, amplify, or dissipate through Transformer computation layers. Specifically, we identify a chaotic "avalanche effect" in the early layers, where minor perturbations trigger binary outcomes: either rapid amplification or complete attenuation. Beyond specific error instances, we demonstrate that LLMs exhibit universal, scale-dependent chaotic behaviors characterized by three distinct regimes: 1) a stable regime, where perturbations fall below an input-dependent threshold and vanish, resulting in constant outputs; 2) a chaotic regime, where rounding errors dominate and drive output divergence; and 3) a signal-dominated regime, where true input variations override numerical noise. We validate these findings extensively across multiple datasets and model architectures.
Comments: 8 pages, 9 figures
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Numerical Analysis (math.NA)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.13206 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2604.13206v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.13206
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Chashi Mahiul Islam [view email]
[v1] Tue, 14 Apr 2026 18:26:38 UTC (3,242 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.LG
cs.NA
math
math.NA
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)