CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Apr 17, 2026

Exploration and Exploitation Errors Are Measurable for Language Model Agents

arXiv AI Archived Apr 17, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2604.13151v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language Model (LM) agents are increasingly used in complex open-ended decision-making tasks, from AI coding to physical AI. A core requirement in these settings is the ability to both explore the problem space and exploit acquired knowledge effectively. However, systematically distinguishing and quantifying exploration and exploitation from observed actions without access to the agent's internal policy remains challenging. To address this, we desi

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 14 Apr 2026] Exploration and Exploitation Errors Are Measurable for Language Model Agents Jaden Park, Jungtaek Kim, Jongwon Jeong, Robert D. Nowak, Kangwook Lee, Yong Jae Lee Language Model (LM) agents are increasingly used in complex open-ended decision-making tasks, from AI coding to physical AI. A core requirement in these settings is the ability to both explore the problem space and exploit acquired knowledge effectively. However, systematically distinguishing and quantifying exploration and exploitation from observed actions without access to the agent's internal policy remains challenging. To address this, we design controllable environments inspired by practical embodied AI scenarios. Each environment consists of a partially observable 2D grid map and an unknown task Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG). The map generation can be programmatically adjusted to emphasize exploration or exploitation difficulty. To enable policy-agnostic evaluation, we design a metric to quantify exploration and exploitation errors from agent's actions. We evaluate a variety of frontier LM agents and find that even state-of-the-art models struggle on our task, with different models exhibiting distinct failure modes. We further observe that reasoning models solve the task more effectively and show both exploration and exploitation can be significantly improved through minimal harness engineering. We release our code \href{this https URL}{here}. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2604.13151 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2604.13151v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.13151 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Jaden Park [view email] [v1] Tue, 14 Apr 2026 17:59:57 UTC (1,268 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-04 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Apr 17, 2026
    Archived
    Apr 17, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗