Structural Dependency Analysis for Masked NTT Hardware: Scalable Pre-Silicon Verification of Post-Quantum Cryptographic Accelerators
arXiv SecurityArchived Apr 17, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.15249v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Post-quantum cryptographic accelerators require side-channel resistance evidence for FIPS 140-3 certification. However, exact masking-verification tools scale only to gadgets of a few thousand cells. We present a four-stage verification hierarchy, D0/D1 structural dependency analysis, fresh-mask refinement, Boolean Single-Authentication Distance Checking (SADC), and arithmetic SADC, that extends sound first-order masking verification to production
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 16 Apr 2026]
Structural Dependency Analysis for Masked NTT Hardware: Scalable Pre-Silicon Verification of Post-Quantum Cryptographic Accelerators
Ray Iskander, Khaled Kirah
Post-quantum cryptographic accelerators require side-channel resistance evidence for FIPS 140-3 certification. However, exact masking-verification tools scale only to gadgets of a few thousand cells. We present a four-stage verification hierarchy, D0/D1 structural dependency analysis, fresh-mask refinement, Boolean Single-Authentication Distance Checking (SADC), and arithmetic SADC, that extends sound first-order masking verification to production arithmetic modules. Applied to the 1.17-million-cell Adams Bridge ML-DSA/ML-KEM accelerator, structural analysis completes in seconds across all 30 masked submodules. A multi-cycle extension (MC-D1) reclassifies 12 modules from structurally clean to structurally flagged. On the 5,543-cell ML-KEM Barrett reduction module, the pipeline machine-verifies 198 of 363 structurally flagged wires (54.5%) as first-order secure, reports 165 as candidate insecure for designer triage (a sound upper bound), and leaves 0 indeterminate. Every verdict is cross validated by Z3 and CVC5 with 0 disagreements across 363 wires. The result narrows manual review from hundreds of structural flags to 165 actionable candidates with mathematical certificates, enabling pre-silicon side-channel evidence generation on production ML-KEM hardware.
Comments: 36 pages, 4 figures
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.15249 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2604.15249v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.15249
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Khaled Kirah Dr [view email]
[v1] Thu, 16 Apr 2026 17:25:01 UTC (821 KB)
Access Paper:
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)