CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◌ Quantum Computing Apr 16, 2026

Does my fidelity estimation and hardware suitability analysis appear correct?

Quantum Computing SE Archived Apr 16, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

I have performed a high-level characterization of a 5-qubit quantum circuit that implements 20 gates (10 single-qubit + 10 two-qubit CNOT gates) at a circuit depth of 10. The circuit starts with Hadamard gates on all qubits, followed by a balanced sequence of CNOT entangling operations interspersed with Pauli-X gates and a few fixed-angle (π/2) parameterized rotations. Measurements are performed on all qubits at the end. Key metrics I derived: Gate density = 20 gates / (10 depth × 5 qubits) = 0.

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Does my fidelity estimation and hardware suitability analysis appear correct? Ask Question Asked today Modified today Viewed 4 times 0 I have performed a high-level characterization of a 5-qubit quantum circuit that implements 20 gates (10 single-qubit + 10 two-qubit CNOT gates) at a circuit depth of 10. The circuit starts with Hadamard gates on all qubits, followed by a balanced sequence of CNOT entangling operations interspersed with Pauli-X gates and a few fixed-angle (π/2) parameterized rotations. Measurements are performed on all qubits at the end. Key metrics I derived: Gate density = 20 gates / (10 depth × 5 qubits) = 0.4 Rough fidelity estimate (using standard depolarizing-noise model with typical error rates ε₂Q ≈ 3×10⁻³ and ε₁Q ≈ 3×10⁻⁴): ( F_{2Q} = \exp(-10 \times 3 \times 10^{-3}) \approx 0.9704 ) ( F_{1Q} = \exp(-10 \times 3 \times 10^{-4}) \approx 0.9970 ) ( F_{\text{total}} \lesssim F_{2Q} \times F_{1Q} \approx 0.968 ) Two-qubit gate noise is the dominant error source, which aligns with current superconducting platforms (T₁/T₂ ≈ 100–300 µs, two-qubit gate time ≈ 300 ns). My conclusions: The circuit shows efficient entanglement topology and balanced single-/two-qubit usage, suggesting good computational capability within NISQ constraints. With the estimated fidelity ~0.968, the circuit is realistically executable on today’s superconducting hardware. Error-mitigation techniques (zero-noise extrapolation, probabilistic error cancellation) should yield noticeable improvements. Full circuit summary (for reference): 5 qubits, 20 total gates, depth = 10 Sequential ordering: 5× Hadamard → 10× CNOT + Pauli-X + fixed-angle rotations Measurement on all qubits My request for validation: Is this characterization and fidelity calculation sound? Are the assumptions (error rates, multiplicative fidelity model, dominant 2Q noise) appropriate for a quick high-level analysis? Would you recommend any additional metrics (e.g., qubit connectivity graph, transpilation cost on a specific backend, or more sophisticated noise modeling) before running this on real hardware? Any suggestions for improving the analysis or making it more robust are welcome quantum-algorithms Share Improve this question Follow asked 1 hour ago Donte Lightfoot 213 3 bronze badges Add a comment Know someone who can answer? Share a link to this question via email, Twitter, or Facebook. Your Answer Sign up or log in Sign up using Google Sign up using Email and Password Post as a guest Name Email Required, but never shown Post Your Answer By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy. Start asking to get answers Find the answer to your question by asking. Ask question Explore related questions quantum-algorithms See similar questions with these tags. The Overflow Blog Human input needed: take our survey on AI agents Who needs VCs when you have friends like these? Related 14 Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations (HHL09): Step 1 - Confusion regarding the usage of phase estimation algorithm 6 Phase estimation error analysis 4 Quantum comparator with one fixed input 10 Hadamard Overlap Test 7 Algorithm resource estimation: why "usually" only the T 𝑇 gate count is being provided. When the Clifford count is provided, does that include Id gate 3 What is the promise gap in APPROX-CIRCUIT-VALUE (BQP-complete) problem? Hot Network Questions Subtlety in Schrödinger vs Heisenberg picture Elliptic integral substitution gone wrong Convert string in iso8601 format to datetime Is there a way to get alerts when my daughter receives calls from numbers not saved in her contacts? Associate Editor for Multiple Journals Hall's paper on Hall algebras Can a single physical server boot and run two Debian systems from different partitions? Generating integers using EML Find all sets of thousand natural numbers such that their product equals their sum. Intuition behind the set identity in the proof that the pointwise limit of measurable functions is measurable Translate roman-numerals to integer What do the eigenvalues of a QFT matrix show Cryptic Family Reunion at the Races What is the maximum number of chairs that can be occupied simultaneously? How to translate a "flake" to spanish? на то to mean "that is why" Slab-on-grade framing: How do I properly protect the wall from water/pests, etc? Can a character work on multiple crafting projects at the same time? Can you still receive trading cards for a game if you unmark it as private? Flight Following best practice for student pilot more hot questions Question feed By continuing to use this website, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. By exiting this window, default cookies will be accepted. To reject cookies, select an option from below. Customize settings Cookie Consent Preference Center When you visit any of our websites, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences, or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and manage your preferences. Please note, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Cookie Policy Accept all cookies Manage Consent Preferences Strictly Necessary Cookies Always Active These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information. Targeting Cookies Targeting Cookies These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you and may be set through our site by us or by our advertising partners. They may be used to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant advertising on our site or on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. Performance Cookies Performance Cookies These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance. Functional Cookies Functional Cookies These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then some or all of these services may not function properly. Cookie List Clear checkbox label label Apply Cancel Consent Leg.Interest checkbox label label checkbox label label checkbox label label Necessary cookies only Confirm My Choices
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    Quantum Computing SE
    Category
    ◌ Quantum Computing
    Published
    Apr 16, 2026
    Archived
    Apr 16, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗