The Long-Horizon Task Mirage? Diagnosing Where and Why Agentic Systems Break
arXiv AIArchived Apr 15, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.11978v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents perform strongly on short- and mid-horizon tasks, but often break down on long-horizon tasks that require extended, interdependent action sequences. Despite rapid progress in agentic systems, these long-horizon failures remain poorly characterized, hindering principled diagnosis and comparison across domains. To address this gap, we introduce HORIZON, an initial cross-domain diagnostic benchmark for systematically
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 13 Apr 2026]
The Long-Horizon Task Mirage? Diagnosing Where and Why Agentic Systems Break
Xinyu Jessica Wang, Haoyue Bai, Yiyou Sun, Haorui Wang, Shuibai Zhang, Wenjie Hu, Mya Schroder, Bilge Mutlu, Dawn Song, Robert D Nowak
Large language model (LLM) agents perform strongly on short- and mid-horizon tasks, but often break down on long-horizon tasks that require extended, interdependent action sequences. Despite rapid progress in agentic systems, these long-horizon failures remain poorly characterized, hindering principled diagnosis and comparison across domains. To address this gap, we introduce HORIZON, an initial cross-domain diagnostic benchmark for systematically constructing tasks and analyzing long-horizon failure behaviors in LLM-based agents. Using HORIZON, we evaluate state-of-the-art (SOTA) agents from multiple model families (GPT-5 variants and Claude models), collecting 3100+ trajectories across four representative agentic domains to study horizon-dependent degradation patterns. We further propose a trajectory-grounded LLM-as-a-Judge pipeline for scalable and reproducible failure attribution, and validate it with human annotation on trajectories, achieving strong agreement (inter-annotator \kappa=0.61; human-judge \kappa=0.84). Our findings offer an initial methodological step toward systematic, cross-domain analysis of long-horizon agent failures and offer practical guidance for building more reliable long-horizon agents. We release our project website at \href{this https URL}{HORIZON Leaderboard} and welcome contributions from the community.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.11978 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2604.11978v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.11978
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Haoyue Bai [view email]
[v1] Mon, 13 Apr 2026 19:11:42 UTC (12,467 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)