The Non-Optimality of Scientific Knowledge: Path Dependence, Lock-In, and The Local Minimum Trap
arXiv AIArchived Apr 15, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.11828v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Science is widely regarded as humanity's most reliable method for uncovering truths about the natural world. Yet the \emph{trajectory} of scientific discovery is rarely examined as an optimization problem in its own right. This paper argues that the body of scientific knowledge, at any given historical moment, represents a \emph{local optimum} rather than a global one--that the frameworks, formalisms, and paradigms through which we understand natur
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 11 Apr 2026]
The Non-Optimality of Scientific Knowledge: Path Dependence, Lock-In, and The Local Minimum Trap
Mohamed Mabrok
Science is widely regarded as humanity's most reliable method for uncovering truths about the natural world. Yet the \emph{trajectory} of scientific discovery is rarely examined as an optimization problem in its own right. This paper argues that the body of scientific knowledge, at any given historical moment, represents a \emph{local optimum} rather than a global one--that the frameworks, formalisms, and paradigms through which we understand nature are substantially shaped by historical contingency, cognitive path dependence, and institutional lock-in. Drawing an analogy to gradient descent in machine learning, we propose that science follows the steepest local gradient of tractability, empirical accessibility, and institutional reward, and in doing so may bypass fundamentally superior descriptions of nature. We develop this thesis through detailed case studies spanning mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, neuroscience, and statistical methodology. We identify three interlocking mechanisms of lock-in--cognitive, formal, and institutional--and argue that recognizing these mechanisms is a prerequisite for designing meta-scientific strategies capable of escaping local optima. We conclude by proposing concrete interventions and discussing the epistemological implications of our thesis for the philosophy of science.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.11828 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2604.11828v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.11828
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Mohamed A. Mabrok [view email]
[v1] Sat, 11 Apr 2026 17:09:43 UTC (26 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CY
math
math.OC
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)