CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Apr 15, 2026

SIR-Bench: Evaluating Investigation Depth in Security Incident Response Agents

arXiv Security Archived Apr 15, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2604.12040v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present SIR-Bench, a benchmark of 794 test cases for evaluating autonomous security incident response agents that distinguishes genuine forensic investigation from alert parroting. Derived from 129 anonymized incident patterns with expert-validated ground truth, SIR-Bench measures not only whether agents reach correct triage decisions, but whether they discover novel evidence through active investigation. To construct SIR-Bench, we develop Once

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 13 Apr 2026] SIR-Bench: Evaluating Investigation Depth in Security Incident Response Agents Daniel Begimher, Cristian Leo, Jack Huang, Pat Gaw, Bonan Zheng We present SIR-Bench, a benchmark of 794 test cases for evaluating autonomous security incident response agents that distinguishes genuine forensic investigation from alert parroting. Derived from 129 anonymized incident patterns with expert-validated ground truth, SIR-Bench measures not only whether agents reach correct triage decisions, but whether they discover novel evidence through active investigation. To construct SIR-Bench, we develop Once Upon A Threat (OUAT), a framework that replays real incident patterns in controlled cloud environments, producing authentic telemetry with measurable investigation outcomes. Our evaluation methodology introduces three complementary metrics: triage accuracy (M1), novel finding discovery (M2), and tool usage appropriateness (M3), assessed through an adversarial LLM-as-Judge that inverts the burden of proof -- requiring concrete forensic evidence to credit investigations. Evaluating our SIR agent on the benchmark demonstrates 97.1% true positive (TP) detection, 73.4% false positive (FP) rejection, and 5.67 novel key findings per case, establishing a baseline against which future investigation agents can be measured. Comments: 9 pages, 6 tables, 1 figure. Equal contribution by first three authors Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Software Engineering (cs.SE) Cite as: arXiv:2604.12040 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2604.12040v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.12040 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Daniel Begimher [view email] [v1] Mon, 13 Apr 2026 20:32:03 UTC (12 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-04 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI cs.SE References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Apr 15, 2026
    Archived
    Apr 15, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗