Why Orgs Need to Test Networks to Withstand DDoS Attacks During Peak Loads

СLOUD SECURITY CYBER RISK CYBERSECURITY OPERATIONS COMMENTARY Cybersecurity In-Depth: Getting answers to questions about IT security threats and best practices from trusted cybersecurity professionals and industry experts. Why Orgs Need to Test Networks to Withstand DDoS Attacks During Peak Loads Security teams can't test distributed denial-of-service defenses in a vacuum. They need to test during periods of high demand, such as tax filing deadlines. Matthew Andriani,Co-founder and CEO,MazeBolt April 13, 2026 2 Min Read SOURCE: DRAGON CLAWS VIA ALAMY STOCK PHOTO QUESTION: How should security teams ensure they are effectively testing their DDoS defenses against their environment? Matthew Andriani, co-founder and CEO MazeBolt: Millions of people wait until the final days, if not the last day, before the tax filing deadline. Any platform handling tax filings, refund processing, or document uploads should recognize that the filing rush creates a perfect storm in which attacks can have a greater operational impact, as cyberattackers often carry out their activities during these peak-demand periods. During these peak loads, availability risk increases, and Layer 7 endpoints like login, account creation, and submission APIs can become harder to protect without blocking legitimate users. Filers are already worried about the deadline, so repeated login failures, stalling, or unexplained timeouts quickly erode trust. This is not theoretical; there have been instances where government systems experienced cyberattacks during peak filing periods. In 2025, users in the Netherlands were unable to log in to DigiD for hours following a DDoS attack shortly after tax filing opened, disrupting access during a high-demand period. Similarly, Poland’s national registry system experienced a cyber incident coinciding with its tax deadline, affecting access to critical government services. These incidents underscore how predictable traffic surges can amplify the operational impact of disruption. Related:Microsoft Bets $10 Billion to Boost Japan's AI, Cybersecurity To identify and fix DDoS vulnerabilities, organizations typically rely on periodic DDoS testing conducted during maintenance windows. However, the environment you tested in January isn't the one you're running in April. Application releases, infrastructure modifications, CDN routing changes, and bot mitigation updates can all alter how defenses behave under peak demand. Rather than relying on point-in-time assessments or even just guessing, a strategy of continuously identifying vulnerabilities allows security teams to proactively remediate critical vulnerabilities in their DDoS defenses and configurations. Security teams need to confirm that attack traffic will be stopped and legitimate filers won’t get caught in the crossfire. Outages rarely come from “unknown unknowns”; they come from assumptions that were never tested. Continuous, nondisruptive testing alongside live traffic makes it possible to confirm both. Here are some questions security leaders should be asking: Have we tested authentication and API endpoints so that we can identify and remediate DDoS vulnerabilities and misconfigurations? Related:CSA: CISOs Should Prepare for Post-Mythos Exploit Storm Loading... Have we validated rate-limiting and bot controls against Layer 7 abuse? Have recent application, infrastructure or policy changes introduced new exposure? Do we have evidence that defenses perform as expected today? Tax season will always bring heightened demand for a short period. What organizations can control is not just assuming they are ready, but employing strategies to keep their defenses working consistently so they will hold. About the Author Matthew Andriani Co-founder and CEO, MazeBolt Matthew Andriani is the founder and CEO of MazeBolt and a cybersecurity executive with more than 20 years of experience in network and application security. Prior to founding MazeBolt, he held leadership roles at Radware and Check Point, focusing on large-scale attack mitigation and service availability. Want more Dark Reading stories in your Google search results? ADD US NOW More Insights Industry Reports AI SOC for MDR: The Structural Evolution of Managed Detection and Response How Enterprises Are Developing Secure Applications 2026 CISO AI Risk Report QKS AI Maturity Matrix KuppingerCole Business Application Risk Management Leadership Compass Access More Research Webinars Defending Against AI-Powered Attacks: The Evolution of Adversarial Machine Learning Zero Trust Architecture for Cloud environments: Implementation Roadmap Tips for Managing Cloud Security in a Hybrid Environment? Security in the AI Age Identity Maturity Under Pressure: 2026 Findings and How to Catch Up More Webinars You May Also Like СLOUD SECURITY Agentic AI Use Cases for Security Soar, but Risks Demand Close Attention by Arielle Waldman AUG 14, 2025 СLOUD SECURITY Hundreds of MCP Servers Expose AI Models to Abuse, RCE by Nate Nelson, Contributing Writer JUN 25, 2025 CYBERATTACKS & DATA BREACHES DeepSeek Breach Opens Floodgates to Dark Web by Emma Zaballos APR 22, 2025 СLOUD SECURITY CISA Weighs In on Alleged Oracle Cloud Breach by Kristina Beek, Associate Editor, Dark Reading APR 18, 2025 Latest Articles in The Edge CYBERSECURITY OPERATIONS RSAC 2026: How AI Is Reshaping Cybersecurity Faster Than Ever APR 7, 2026 CYBERSECURITY OPERATIONS Human vs. AI: Debates Shape RSAC 2026 Cybersecurity Trends APR 7, 2026 CYBER RISK Lies, Damned Lies, and Cybersecurity Metrics APR 7, 2026 CYBER RISK Shadow AI in Healthcare Is Here to Stay APR 6, 2026 Read More The Edge Edge Picks APPLICATION SECURITY AI Agents in Browsers Light on Cybersecurity, Bypass Controls CYBER RISK Browser Extensions Pose Heightened, but Manageable, Security Risks CYBERSECURITY OPERATIONS Video Convos: Agentic AI, Apple, EV Chargers; Cybersecurity Peril Abounds ENDPOINT SECURITY Extension Poisoning Campaign Highlights Gaps in Browser Security Loading...