CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Apr 14, 2026

OOWM: Structuring Embodied Reasoning and Planning via Object-Oriented Programmatic World Modeling

arXiv AI Archived Apr 14, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2604.09580v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Standard Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting empowers Large Language Models (LLMs) with reasoning capabilities, yet its reliance on linear natural language is inherently insufficient for effective world modeling in embodied tasks. While text offers flexibility, it fails to explicitly represent the state-space, object hierarchies, and causal dependencies required for robust robotic planning. To address these limitations, we propose Object-Oriented Worl

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 25 Feb 2026] OOWM: Structuring Embodied Reasoning and Planning via Object-Oriented Programmatic World Modeling Hongyu Chen, Liang Lin, Guangrun Wang Standard Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting empowers Large Language Models (LLMs) with reasoning capabilities, yet its reliance on linear natural language is inherently insufficient for effective world modeling in embodied tasks. While text offers flexibility, it fails to explicitly represent the state-space, object hierarchies, and causal dependencies required for robust robotic planning. To address these limitations, we propose Object-Oriented World Modeling (OOWM), a novel framework that structures embodied reasoning through the lens of software engineering formalisms. We redefine the world model not as a latent vector space, but as an explicit symbolic tuple W = \langle S, T \rangle: a State Abstraction (G_\text{state}) instantiating the environmental state S, coupled with a Control Policy (G_\text{control}) representing the transition logic T: S \times A \rightarrow S'. OOWM leverages the Unified Modeling Language (UML) to materialize this definition: it employs Class Diagrams to ground visual perception into rigorous object hierarchies, and Activity Diagrams to operationalize planning into executable control flows. Furthermore, we introduce a three-stage training pipeline combining Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). Crucially, this method utilizes outcome-based rewards from the final plan to implicitly optimize the underlying object-oriented reasoning structure, enabling effective learning even with sparse annotations. Extensive evaluations on the MRoom-30k benchmark demonstrate that OOWM significantly outperforms unstructured textual baselines in planning coherence, execution success, and structural fidelity, establishing a new paradigm for structured embodied reasoning. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2604.09580 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2604.09580v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.09580 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Hongyu Chen [view email] [v1] Wed, 25 Feb 2026 16:01:07 UTC (1,322 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-04 Change to browse by: cs cs.LG References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Apr 14, 2026
    Archived
    Apr 14, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗