Linear Programming for Multi-Criteria Assessment with Cardinal and Ordinal Data: A Pessimistic Virtual Gap Analysis
arXiv AIArchived Apr 14, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.09555v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-criteria Analysis (MCA) is used to rank alternatives based on various criteria. Key MCA methods, such as Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods, estimate parameters for criteria to compute the performance of each alternative. Nonetheless, subjective evaluations and biases frequently influence the reliability of results, while the diversity of data affects the precision of the parameters. The novel linear programming-based Virtual Ga
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 5 Feb 2026]
Linear Programming for Multi-Criteria Assessment with Cardinal and Ordinal Data: A Pessimistic Virtual Gap Analysis
Fuh-Hwa Franklin Liu, Su-Chuan Shih
Multi-criteria Analysis (MCA) is used to rank alternatives based on various criteria. Key MCA methods, such as Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods, estimate parameters for criteria to compute the performance of each alternative. Nonetheless, subjective evaluations and biases frequently influence the reliability of results, while the diversity of data affects the precision of the parameters. The novel linear programming-based Virtual Gap Analysis (VGA) models tackle these issues. This paper outlines a two-step method that integrates two novel VGA models to assess each alternative from a pessimistic perspective, using both quantitative and qualitative criteria, and employing cardinal and ordinal data. Next, prioritize the alternatives to eliminate the least favorable one. The proposed method is dependable and scalable, enabling thorough assessments efficiently and effectively within decision support systems.
Comments: 36 pages, 6 figure, 3 tables
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
MSC classes: 90B50, 90C29, 90C08, 91A80, 91B06
Cite as: arXiv:2604.09555 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2604.09555v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.09555
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Fuh-Hwa Liu [view email]
[v1] Thu, 5 Feb 2026 05:56:57 UTC (586 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
math
math.OC
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)