CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Apr 13, 2026

Mind the Gap Between Spatial Reasoning and Acting! Step-by-Step Evaluation of Agents With Spatial-Gym

arXiv AI Archived Apr 13, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2604.09338v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Spatial reasoning is central to navigation and robotics, yet measuring model capabilities on these tasks remains difficult. Existing benchmarks evaluate models in a one-shot setting, requiring full solution generation in a single response, unlike humans, who work in interactive environments step-by-step. We introduce Spatial-Gym, a Gymnasium environment that isolates spatial constraint reasoning by testing pathfinding in 2D-grid puzzles as a sequen

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 10 Apr 2026] Mind the Gap Between Spatial Reasoning and Acting! Step-by-Step Evaluation of Agents With Spatial-Gym Lars Benedikt Kaesberg, Tianyu Yang, Niklas Bauer, Terry Ruas, Jan Philip Wahle, Bela Gipp Spatial reasoning is central to navigation and robotics, yet measuring model capabilities on these tasks remains difficult. Existing benchmarks evaluate models in a one-shot setting, requiring full solution generation in a single response, unlike humans, who work in interactive environments step-by-step. We introduce Spatial-Gym, a Gymnasium environment that isolates spatial constraint reasoning by testing pathfinding in 2D-grid puzzles as a sequential decision task with optional backtracking. We evaluate eight models in three settings (one-shot, step-by-step, step-by-step with backtracking) against human, random, and A* baselines on 500 episodes. The best model, GPT-OSS 120B, achieves a solve rate of 16.0%, 82 points below the human baseline (98.0%). Step-by-step format helps weaker models (up to +5.4%) by removing formatting errors, but hurts stronger models (up to 5.6%) by constraining global planning. Backtracking improves episode completion, but increases solve rate only for weaker models; stronger models rarely backtrack and do not benefit from it. Our experiments have three key findings: (1) models fail to scale reasoning effort with difficulty, (2) vision models receiving images of the spatial environment reduce solve rate by 73%, and (3) extended chain-of-thought reasoning retains a 3-5x accuracy advantage over standard inference even in the step-by-step setting. Spatial-Gym enables diagnosis of model limitations and provides a framework for improving spatial reasoning through reinforcement learning. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL) Cite as: arXiv:2604.09338 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2604.09338v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.09338 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Lars Kaesberg [view email] [v1] Fri, 10 Apr 2026 14:05:50 UTC (1,995 KB) Access Paper: view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-04 Change to browse by: cs cs.CL References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Apr 13, 2026
    Archived
    Apr 13, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗