CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Apr 13, 2026

StaRPO: Stability-Augmented Reinforcement Policy Optimization

arXiv AI Archived Apr 13, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2604.08905v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) is effective in enhancing the accuracy of large language models in complex reasoning tasks. Existing RL policy optimization frameworks rely on final-answer correctness as feedback signals and rarely capture the internal logical structure of the reasoning process. Consequently, the models would generate fluent and semantically relevant responses but logically inconsistent, structurally erratic, or redundant. To this end,

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 10 Apr 2026] StaRPO: Stability-Augmented Reinforcement Policy Optimization Jinghan Zhang, Fengran Mo, Tharindu Cyril Weerasooriya, Ruimin Dai, Xiaoyan Han, Yanjie Fu, Dakuo Wang, Kunpeng Liu Reinforcement learning (RL) is effective in enhancing the accuracy of large language models in complex reasoning tasks. Existing RL policy optimization frameworks rely on final-answer correctness as feedback signals and rarely capture the internal logical structure of the reasoning process. Consequently, the models would generate fluent and semantically relevant responses but logically inconsistent, structurally erratic, or redundant. To this end, we propose StaRPO, a stability-augmented reinforcement learning framework that explicitly incorporates reasoning stability into the optimization objective. Our StaRPO decomposes stability into two computable lightweight metrics: the Autocorrelation Function (ACF) to evaluate local step-to-step coherence, and Path Efficiency (PE) to evaluate global goal-directedness of the reasoning trajectory. These stability rewards are combined with task rewards to provide complementary and process-aware feedback. We validate the effectiveness of using ACF and PE rewards by showing their correlation with logic errors on two backbone models. Experiments on four reasoning benchmarks show that StaRPO consistently outperforms compared baselines and can enhance both final-answer accuracy and logical stability. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2604.08905 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2604.08905v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.08905 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Jinghan Zhang [view email] [v1] Fri, 10 Apr 2026 03:13:19 UTC (333 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-04 Change to browse by: cs cs.LG References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Apr 13, 2026
    Archived
    Apr 13, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗