CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Apr 13, 2026

OpenKedge: Governing Agentic Mutation with Execution-Bound Safety and Evidence Chains

arXiv AI Archived Apr 13, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2604.08601v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rise of autonomous AI agents exposes a fundamental flaw in API-centric architectures: probabilistic systems directly execute state mutations without sufficient context, coordination, or safety guarantees. We introduce OpenKedge, a protocol that redefines mutation as a governed process rather than an immediate consequence of API invocation. OpenKedge requires actors to submit declarative intent proposals, which are evaluated against deterministi

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 7 Apr 2026] OpenKedge: Governing Agentic Mutation with Execution-Bound Safety and Evidence Chains Jun He, Deying Yu The rise of autonomous AI agents exposes a fundamental flaw in API-centric architectures: probabilistic systems directly execute state mutations without sufficient context, coordination, or safety guarantees. We introduce OpenKedge, a protocol that redefines mutation as a governed process rather than an immediate consequence of API invocation. OpenKedge requires actors to submit declarative intent proposals, which are evaluated against deterministically derived system state, temporal signals, and policy constraints prior to execution. Approved intents are compiled into execution contracts that strictly bound permitted actions, resource scope, and time, and are enforced via ephemeral, task-oriented identities. This shifts safety from reactive filtering to preventative, execution-bound enforcement. Crucially, OpenKedge introduces an Intent-to-Execution Evidence Chain (IEEC), which cryptographically links intent, context, policy decisions, execution bounds, and outcomes into a unified lineage. This transforms mutation into a verifiable and reconstructable process, enabling deterministic auditability and reasoning about system behavior. We evaluate OpenKedge across multi-agent conflict scenarios and cloud infrastructure mutations. Results show that the protocol deterministically arbitrates competing intents and cages unsafe execution while maintaining high throughput, establishing a principled foundation for safely operating agentic systems at scale. Comments: 17 pages, 3 figures, 2 tables Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2604.08601 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2604.08601v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.08601 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Jun He [view email] [v1] Tue, 7 Apr 2026 22:51:08 UTC (29 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-04 Change to browse by: cs cs.LG References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Apr 13, 2026
    Archived
    Apr 13, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗