CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Apr 13, 2026

Joint Interference Detection and Identification via Adversarial Multi-task Learning

arXiv Security Archived Apr 13, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2604.08607v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Precise interference detection and identification are crucial for enhancing the survivability of communication systems in non-cooperative wireless environments. While deep learning (DL) has advanced this field, existing single-task learning (STL) approaches neglect inherent task correlations. Furthermore, emerging multi-task learning (MTL) methods often lack a theoretical foundation for quantifying and modeling task relationships. To bridge this

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Machine Learning [Submitted on 8 Apr 2026] Joint Interference Detection and Identification via Adversarial Multi-task Learning H. Xu, B. He, S. Wang Precise interference detection and identification are crucial for enhancing the survivability of communication systems in non-cooperative wireless environments. While deep learning (DL) has advanced this field, existing single-task learning (STL) approaches neglect inherent task correlations. Furthermore, emerging multi-task learning (MTL) methods often lack a theoretical foundation for quantifying and modeling task relationships. To bridge this gap, we establish a theoretically grounded MTL framework for joint interference detection, modulation identification, and interference identification. First, we derive an upper bound for the weighted expected loss in MTL frameworks. This bound explicitly connects MTL performance to task similarity, quantified by the Wasserstein distance and learnable task relation coefficients. Guided by this theory, we present the adversarial multi-task interference detection and identification network (AMTIDIN), which integrates adversarial training to minimize distributional discrepancies across tasks and uses adaptive coefficients to model task correlations dynamically. Crucially, we conducted a quantitative analysis of task similarity to reveal intrinsic task relationships, specifically that modulation identification and interference identification share a substantial feature overlap distinct from interference detection. Extensive comparative experiments demonstrate that AMTIDIN significantly outperforms both its task-specific STL baseline and state-of-the-art MTL baselines in robustness and generalization, particularly under challenging conditions with limited training data, short signal lengths, and low signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). Comments: 13 pages, 13 figures. Submitted to IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Information Theory (cs.IT) Cite as: arXiv:2604.08607 [cs.LG]   (or arXiv:2604.08607v1 [cs.LG] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.08607 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Haitao Xu [view email] [v1] Wed, 8 Apr 2026 14:41:03 UTC (1,355 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.LG < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-04 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI cs.CR cs.IT math math.IT References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Apr 13, 2026
    Archived
    Apr 13, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗