CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Apr 13, 2026

XFED: Non-Collusive Model Poisoning Attack Against Byzantine-Robust Federated Classifiers

arXiv Security Archived Apr 13, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2604.09489v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Model poisoning attacks pose a significant security threat to Federated Learning (FL). Most existing model poisoning attacks rely on collusion, requiring adversarial clients to coordinate by exchanging local benign models and synchronizing the generation of their poisoned updates. However, sustaining such coordination is increasingly impractical in real-world FL deployments, as it effectively requires botnet-like control over many devices. This app

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 10 Apr 2026] XFED: Non-Collusive Model Poisoning Attack Against Byzantine-Robust Federated Classifiers Israt Jahan Mouri, Muhammad Ridowan, Muhammad Abdullah Adnan Model poisoning attacks pose a significant security threat to Federated Learning (FL). Most existing model poisoning attacks rely on collusion, requiring adversarial clients to coordinate by exchanging local benign models and synchronizing the generation of their poisoned updates. However, sustaining such coordination is increasingly impractical in real-world FL deployments, as it effectively requires botnet-like control over many devices. This approach is costly to maintain and highly vulnerable to detection. This context raises a fundamental question: Can model poisoning attacks remain effective without any communication between attackers? To address this challenge, we introduce and formalize the \textbf{non-collusive attack model}, in which all compromised clients share a common adversarial objective but operate independently. Under this model, each attacker generates its malicious update without communicating with other adversaries, accessing other clients' updates, or relying on any knowledge of server-side defenses. To demonstrate the feasibility of this threat model, we propose \textbf{XFED}, the first aggregation-agnostic, non-collusive model poisoning attack. Our empirical evaluation across six benchmark datasets shows that XFED bypasses eight state-of-the-art defenses and outperforms six existing model poisoning attacks. These findings indicate that FL systems are substantially less secure than previously believed and underscore the urgent need for more robust and practical defense mechanisms. Comments: 21 pages, 9 figures, 7 tables Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC); Machine Learning (cs.LG) ACM classes: I.2.11; I.2.6 Cite as: arXiv:2604.09489 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2604.09489v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.09489 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Muhammad Abdullah Adnan [view email] [v1] Fri, 10 Apr 2026 16:54:29 UTC (2,134 KB) Access Paper: view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-04 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI cs.DC cs.LG References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Apr 13, 2026
    Archived
    Apr 13, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗