XFED: Non-Collusive Model Poisoning Attack Against Byzantine-Robust Federated Classifiers
arXiv SecurityArchived Apr 13, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.09489v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Model poisoning attacks pose a significant security threat to Federated Learning (FL). Most existing model poisoning attacks rely on collusion, requiring adversarial clients to coordinate by exchanging local benign models and synchronizing the generation of their poisoned updates. However, sustaining such coordination is increasingly impractical in real-world FL deployments, as it effectively requires botnet-like control over many devices. This app
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 10 Apr 2026]
XFED: Non-Collusive Model Poisoning Attack Against Byzantine-Robust Federated Classifiers
Israt Jahan Mouri, Muhammad Ridowan, Muhammad Abdullah Adnan
Model poisoning attacks pose a significant security threat to Federated Learning (FL). Most existing model poisoning attacks rely on collusion, requiring adversarial clients to coordinate by exchanging local benign models and synchronizing the generation of their poisoned updates. However, sustaining such coordination is increasingly impractical in real-world FL deployments, as it effectively requires botnet-like control over many devices. This approach is costly to maintain and highly vulnerable to detection. This context raises a fundamental question: Can model poisoning attacks remain effective without any communication between attackers? To address this challenge, we introduce and formalize the \textbf{non-collusive attack model}, in which all compromised clients share a common adversarial objective but operate independently. Under this model, each attacker generates its malicious update without communicating with other adversaries, accessing other clients' updates, or relying on any knowledge of server-side defenses. To demonstrate the feasibility of this threat model, we propose \textbf{XFED}, the first aggregation-agnostic, non-collusive model poisoning attack. Our empirical evaluation across six benchmark datasets shows that XFED bypasses eight state-of-the-art defenses and outperforms six existing model poisoning attacks. These findings indicate that FL systems are substantially less secure than previously believed and underscore the urgent need for more robust and practical defense mechanisms.
Comments: 21 pages, 9 figures, 7 tables
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
ACM classes: I.2.11; I.2.6
Cite as: arXiv:2604.09489 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2604.09489v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.09489
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Muhammad Abdullah Adnan [view email]
[v1] Fri, 10 Apr 2026 16:54:29 UTC (2,134 KB)
Access Paper:
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
cs.DC
cs.LG
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)