CLIP-Inspector: Model-Level Backdoor Detection for Prompt-Tuned CLIP via OOD Trigger Inversion
arXiv SecurityArchived Apr 13, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.09101v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Organisations with limited data and computational resources increasingly outsource model training to Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) providers, who adapt vision-language models (VLMs) such as CLIP to downstream tasks via prompt tuning rather than training from scratch. This semi-honest setting creates a security risk where a malicious provider can follow the prompt-tuning protocol yet implant a backdoor, forcing triggered inputs to be classif
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 10 Apr 2026]
CLIP-Inspector: Model-Level Backdoor Detection for Prompt-Tuned CLIP via OOD Trigger Inversion
Akshit Jindal, Saket Anand, Chetan Arora, Vikram Goyal
Organisations with limited data and computational resources increasingly outsource model training to Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) providers, who adapt vision-language models (VLMs) such as CLIP to downstream tasks via prompt tuning rather than training from scratch. This semi-honest setting creates a security risk where a malicious provider can follow the prompt-tuning protocol yet implant a backdoor, forcing triggered inputs to be classified into an attacker-chosen class, even for out-of-distribution (OOD) data. Such backdoors leave encoders untouched, making them undetectable to existing methods that focus on encoder corruption. Other data-level methods that sanitize data before training or during inference, also fail to answer the critical question, "Is the delivered model backdoored or not?" To address this model-level verification problem, we introduce CLIP-Inspector (CI), a backdoor detection method designed for prompt-tuned CLIP models. Assuming white-box access to the delivered model and a pool of unlabeled OOD images, CI reconstructs possible triggers for each class to determine if the model exhibits backdoor behaviour or not. Additionally, we demonstrate that using CI's reconstructed trigger for fine-tuning on correctly labeled triggered inputs enables us to re-align the model and reduce backdoor effectiveness. Through extensive experiments across ten datasets and four backdoor attacks, we demonstrate that CI can reconstruct effective triggers in a single epoch using only 1,000 OOD images, achieving a 94% detection accuracy (47/50 models). Compared to adapted trigger-inversion baselines, CI yields a markedly higher AUROC score (0.973 vs 0.495/0.687), thus enabling the vetting and post-hoc repair of prompt-tuned CLIP models to ensure safe deployment.
Comments: 17 pages (8 main + 2 references + 7 supplementary), Accepted to CVPR Findings 2026
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.09101 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2604.09101v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.09101
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Akshit Jindal [view email]
[v1] Fri, 10 Apr 2026 08:33:56 UTC (3,330 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
cs.CV
cs.LG
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)