QNAS: A Neural Architecture Search Framework for Accurate and Efficient Quantum Neural Networks
arXiv QuantumArchived Apr 09, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.07013v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Designing quantum neural networks (QNNs) that are both accurate and deployable on NISQ hardware is challenging. Handcrafted ansatze must balance expressivity, trainability, and resource use, while limited qubits often necessitate circuit cutting. Existing quantum architecture search methods primarily optimize accuracy while only heuristically controlling quantum and mostly ignore the exponential overhead of circuit cutting. We introduce QNAS, a neu
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Quantum Physics
[Submitted on 8 Apr 2026]
QNAS: A Neural Architecture Search Framework for Accurate and Efficient Quantum Neural Networks
Kooshan Maleki, Alberto Marchisio, Muhammad Shafique
Designing quantum neural networks (QNNs) that are both accurate and deployable on NISQ hardware is challenging. Handcrafted ansatze must balance expressivity, trainability, and resource use, while limited qubits often necessitate circuit cutting. Existing quantum architecture search methods primarily optimize accuracy while only heuristically controlling quantum and mostly ignore the exponential overhead of circuit cutting. We introduce QNAS, a neural architecture search framework that unifies hardware aware evaluation, multi objective optimization, and cutting overhead awareness for hybrid quantum classical neural networks (HQNNs). QNAS trains a shared parameter SuperCircuit and uses NSGA-II to optimize three objectives jointly: (i) validation error, (ii) a runtime cost proxy measuring wall clock evaluation time, and (iii) the estimated number of subcircuits under a target qubit budget. QNAS evaluates candidate HQNNs under a few epochs of training and discovers clear Pareto fronts that reveal tradeoffs between accuracy, efficiency, and cutting overhead. Across MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, and Iris benchmarks, we observe that embedding type and CNOT mode selection significantly impact both accuracy and efficiency, with angle-y embedding and sparse entangling patterns outperforming other configurations on image datasets, and amplitude embedding excelling on tabular data (Iris). On MNIST, the best architecture achieves 97.16% test accuracy with a compact 8 qubit, 2 layer circuit; on the more challenging Fashion-MNIST, 87.38% with a 5 qubit, 2 layer circuit; and on Iris, 100% validation accuracy with a 4 qubit, 2 layer circuit. QNAS surfaces these design insights automatically during search, guiding practitioners toward architectures that balance accuracy, resource efficiency, and practical deployability on current hardware.
Comments: To appear at the IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Maastricht, The Netherlands, June 2026
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.07013 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2604.07013v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.07013
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Alberto Marchisio [view email]
[v1] Wed, 8 Apr 2026 12:34:01 UTC (30,417 KB)
Access Paper:
view license
Current browse context:
quant-ph
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.LG
References & Citations
INSPIRE HEP
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)