CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Apr 09, 2026

Steering the Verifiability of Multimodal AI Hallucinations

arXiv AI Archived Apr 09, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2604.06714v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI applications driven by multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are prone to hallucinations and pose considerable risks to human users. Crucially, such hallucinations are not equally problematic: some hallucination contents could be detected by human users(i.e., obvious hallucinations), while others are often missed or require more verification effort(i.e., elusive hallucinations). This indicates that multimodal AI hallucinations vary significan

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 8 Apr 2026] Steering the Verifiability of Multimodal AI Hallucinations Jianhong Pang, Ruoxi Cheng, Ziyi Ye, Xingjun Ma, Zuxuan Wu, Xuanjing Huang, Yu-Gang Jiang AI applications driven by multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are prone to hallucinations and pose considerable risks to human users. Crucially, such hallucinations are not equally problematic: some hallucination contents could be detected by human users(i.e., obvious hallucinations), while others are often missed or require more verification effort(i.e., elusive hallucinations). This indicates that multimodal AI hallucinations vary significantly in their verifiability. Yet, little research has explored how to control this property for AI applications with diverse security and usability demands. To address this gap, we construct a dataset from 4,470 human responses to AI-generated hallucinations and categorize these hallucinations into obvious and elusive types based on their verifiability by human users. Further, we propose an activation-space intervention method that learns separate probes for obvious and elusive hallucinations. We reveal that obvious and elusive hallucinations elicit different intervention probes, allowing for fine-grained control over the model's verifiability. Empirical results demonstrate the efficacy of this approach and show that targeted interventions yield superior performance in regulating corresponding verifiability. Moreover, simply mixing these interventions enables flexible control over the verifiability required for different scenarios. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2604.06714 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2604.06714v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.06714 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Jianhong Pang [view email] [v1] Wed, 8 Apr 2026 06:13:16 UTC (3,778 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-04 Change to browse by: cs cs.CL cs.CV cs.LG References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Apr 09, 2026
    Archived
    Apr 09, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗