Steering the Verifiability of Multimodal AI Hallucinations
arXiv AIArchived Apr 09, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.06714v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI applications driven by multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are prone to hallucinations and pose considerable risks to human users. Crucially, such hallucinations are not equally problematic: some hallucination contents could be detected by human users(i.e., obvious hallucinations), while others are often missed or require more verification effort(i.e., elusive hallucinations). This indicates that multimodal AI hallucinations vary significan
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 8 Apr 2026]
Steering the Verifiability of Multimodal AI Hallucinations
Jianhong Pang, Ruoxi Cheng, Ziyi Ye, Xingjun Ma, Zuxuan Wu, Xuanjing Huang, Yu-Gang Jiang
AI applications driven by multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are prone to hallucinations and pose considerable risks to human users. Crucially, such hallucinations are not equally problematic: some hallucination contents could be detected by human users(i.e., obvious hallucinations), while others are often missed or require more verification effort(i.e., elusive hallucinations). This indicates that multimodal AI hallucinations vary significantly in their verifiability. Yet, little research has explored how to control this property for AI applications with diverse security and usability demands. To address this gap, we construct a dataset from 4,470 human responses to AI-generated hallucinations and categorize these hallucinations into obvious and elusive types based on their verifiability by human users. Further, we propose an activation-space intervention method that learns separate probes for obvious and elusive hallucinations. We reveal that obvious and elusive hallucinations elicit different intervention probes, allowing for fine-grained control over the model's verifiability. Empirical results demonstrate the efficacy of this approach and show that targeted interventions yield superior performance in regulating corresponding verifiability. Moreover, simply mixing these interventions enables flexible control over the verifiability required for different scenarios.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.06714 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2604.06714v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.06714
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Jianhong Pang [view email]
[v1] Wed, 8 Apr 2026 06:13:16 UTC (3,778 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CL
cs.CV
cs.LG
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)