CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Apr 09, 2026

ProofSketcher: Hybrid LLM + Lightweight Proof Checker for Reliable Math/Logic Reasoning

arXiv AI Archived Apr 09, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2604.06401v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The large language models (LLMs) might produce a persuasive argument within mathematical and logical fields, although such argument often includes some minor missteps, including the entire omission of side conditions, invalid inference patterns, or appeals to a lemma that cannot be derived logically out of the context being discussed. These omissions are infamously hard to notice solely out of the text, as even the misconstrued construction still m

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 7 Apr 2026] ProofSketcher: Hybrid LLM + Lightweight Proof Checker for Reliable Math/Logic Reasoning Kranthi Kommuru, Kunal Khanvilkar, Gaurav Parekh The large language models (LLMs) might produce a persuasive argument within mathematical and logical fields, although such argument often includes some minor missteps, including the entire omission of side conditions, invalid inference patterns, or appeals to a lemma that cannot be derived logically out of the context being discussed. These omissions are infamously hard to notice solely out of the text, as even the misconstrued construction still may seem mostly accurate. Conversely, interactive theorem provers like Lean and Coq have rigorous reliability by ensuring that syntactic and semantic statements only accept statements that can pass all the syntactic and semantic steps in the program which is a small trusted kernel of the language type-checks with. Despite the fact that this technique provides strong guarantees, it comes at quite a heavy price: the evidence must be completely formalized, and the evidence user or a auxiliary search program must provide an avalanche of low-level information. This paper presents a hybrid pipeline where an LLM generates a typed proof sketch in a compact DSL and a lightweight trusted kernel expands the sketch into explicit proof obligations. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science (cs.CE); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2604.06401 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2604.06401v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.06401 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Kunal Khanvilkar [view email] [v1] Tue, 7 Apr 2026 19:33:54 UTC (377 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-04 Change to browse by: cs cs.CE cs.CV cs.LG References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Apr 09, 2026
    Archived
    Apr 09, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗