Broken Quantum: A Systematic Formal Verification Study of Security Vulnerabilities Across the Open-Source Quantum Computing Simulator Ecosystem
arXiv SecurityArchived Apr 09, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.06712v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Quantum computing simulators form the classical software foundation on which virtually all quantum algorithm research depends. We present Broken Quantum, the first comprehensive formal security audit of the open-source quantum computing simulator ecosystem. Applying COBALT QAI -- a four-module static analysis engine backed by the Z3 SMT solver -- we analyze 45 open-source quantum simulation frameworks from 22 organizations spanning 12 countries. We
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 8 Apr 2026]
Broken Quantum: A Systematic Formal Verification Study of Security Vulnerabilities Across the Open-Source Quantum Computing Simulator Ecosystem
Dominik Blain
Quantum computing simulators form the classical software foundation on which virtually all quantum algorithm research depends. We present Broken Quantum, the first comprehensive formal security audit of the open-source quantum computing simulator ecosystem. Applying COBALT QAI -- a four-module static analysis engine backed by the Z3 SMT solver -- we analyze 45 open-source quantum simulation frameworks from 22 organizations spanning 12 countries. We identify 547 security findings (40 CRITICAL, 492 HIGH, 15 MEDIUM) across four vulnerability classes: CWE-125/190 (C++ memory corruption), CWE-400 (Python resource exhaustion), CWE-502/94 (unsafe deserialization and code injection), and CWE-77/22 (QASM injection -- a novel, quantum-specific attack vector with no classical analog). All 13 vulnerability patterns are formally verified via Z3 satisfiability proofs (13/13 SAT). The 32-qubit boundary emerges as a consistent formal threshold in both C++ and Python vulnerability chains. Supply chain analysis identifies the first documented case of vulnerability transfer from a commercial quantum framework into US national laboratory infrastructure (IBM Qiskit Aer to XACC/Oak Ridge National Laboratory). Nine frameworks score 100/100 under all four scanners; Qiskit Aer,Cirq, tequila, PennyLane, and 5 others score 0/100.
Comments: 29 pages, 9 tables. COBALT QAI scanner available upon request
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Software Engineering (cs.SE); Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.06712 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2604.06712v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.06712
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Dominik Blain [view email]
[v1] Wed, 8 Apr 2026 06:07:37 UTC (24 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.SE
quant-ph
References & Citations
INSPIRE HEP
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)