TFRBench: A Reasoning Benchmark for Evaluating Forecasting Systems
arXiv AIArchived Apr 08, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.05364v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce TFRBench, the first benchmark designed to evaluate the reasoning capabilities of forecasting systems. Traditionally, time-series forecasting has been evaluated solely on numerical accuracy, treating foundation models as ``black boxes.'' Unlike existing benchmarks, TFRBench provides a protocol for evaluating the reasoning generated by forecasting systems--specifically their analysis of cross-channel dependencies, trends, and external ev
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 7 Apr 2026]
TFRBench: A Reasoning Benchmark for Evaluating Forecasting Systems
Md Atik Ahamed, Mihir Parmar, Palash Goyal, Yiwen Song, Long T. Le, Qiang Cheng, Chun-Liang Li, Hamid Palangi, Jinsung Yoon, Tomas Pfister
We introduce TFRBench, the first benchmark designed to evaluate the reasoning capabilities of forecasting systems. Traditionally, time-series forecasting has been evaluated solely on numerical accuracy, treating foundation models as ``black boxes.'' Unlike existing benchmarks, TFRBench provides a protocol for evaluating the reasoning generated by forecasting systems--specifically their analysis of cross-channel dependencies, trends, and external events. To enable this, we propose a systematic multi-agent framework that utilizes an iterative verification loop to synthesize numerically grounded reasoning traces. Spanning ten datasets across five domains, our evaluation confirms that this reasoning is causally effective; useful for evaluation; and prompting LLMs with our generated traces significantly improves forecasting accuracy compared to direct numerical prediction (e.g., avg. \sim40.2\%\to56.6\%), validating the quality of our reasoning. Conversely, benchmarking experiments reveal that off-the-shelf LLMs consistently struggle with both reasoning (lower LLM-as-a-Judge scores) and numerical forecasting, frequently failing to capture domain-specific dynamics. TFRBench thus establishes a new standard for interpretable, reasoning-based evaluation in time-series forecasting. Our benchmark is available at: this https URL
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.05364 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2604.05364v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.05364
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Md Atik Ahamed [view email]
[v1] Tue, 7 Apr 2026 03:04:45 UTC (10,381 KB)
Access Paper:
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)