From Retinal Evidence to Safe Decisions: RETINA-SAFE and ECRT for Hallucination Risk Triage in Medical LLMs
arXiv AIArchived Apr 08, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.05348v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hallucinations in medical large language models (LLMs) remain a safety-critical issue, particularly when available evidence is insufficient or conflicting. We study this problem in diabetic retinopathy (DR) decision settings and introduce RETINA-SAFE, an evidence-grounded benchmark aligned with retinal grading records, comprising 12,522 samples. RETINA-SAFE is organized into three evidence-relation tasks: E-Align (evidence-consistent), E-Conflict (
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 7 Apr 2026]
From Retinal Evidence to Safe Decisions: RETINA-SAFE and ECRT for Hallucination Risk Triage in Medical LLMs
Zhe Yu, Wenpeng Xing, Meng Han
Hallucinations in medical large language models (LLMs) remain a safety-critical issue, particularly when available evidence is insufficient or conflicting. We study this problem in diabetic retinopathy (DR) decision settings and introduce RETINA-SAFE, an evidence-grounded benchmark aligned with retinal grading records, comprising 12,522 samples. RETINA-SAFE is organized into three evidence-relation tasks: E-Align (evidence-consistent), E-Conflict (evidence-conflicting), and E-Gap (evidence-insufficient). We further propose ECRT (Evidence-Conditioned Risk Triage), a two-stage white-box detection framework: Stage 1 performs Safe/Unsafe risk triage, and Stage 2 refines unsafe cases into contradiction-driven versus evidence-gap risks. ECRT leverages internal representation and logit shifts under CTX/NOCTX conditions, with class-balanced training for robust learning. Under evidence-grouped (not patient-disjoint) splits across multiple backbones, ECRT provides strong Stage-1 risk triage and explicit subtype attribution, improves Stage-1 balanced accuracy by +0.15 to +0.19 over external uncertainty and self-consistency baselines and by +0.02 to +0.07 over the strongest adapted supervised baseline, and consistently exceeds a single-stage white-box ablation on Stage-1 balanced accuracy. These findings support white-box internal signals grounded in retinal evidence as a practical route to interpretable medical LLM risk triage.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.05348 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2604.05348v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.05348
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Wenpeng Xing [view email]
[v1] Tue, 7 Apr 2026 02:40:13 UTC (3,168 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)