CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Apr 08, 2026

From Retinal Evidence to Safe Decisions: RETINA-SAFE and ECRT for Hallucination Risk Triage in Medical LLMs

arXiv AI Archived Apr 08, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2604.05348v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hallucinations in medical large language models (LLMs) remain a safety-critical issue, particularly when available evidence is insufficient or conflicting. We study this problem in diabetic retinopathy (DR) decision settings and introduce RETINA-SAFE, an evidence-grounded benchmark aligned with retinal grading records, comprising 12,522 samples. RETINA-SAFE is organized into three evidence-relation tasks: E-Align (evidence-consistent), E-Conflict (

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 7 Apr 2026] From Retinal Evidence to Safe Decisions: RETINA-SAFE and ECRT for Hallucination Risk Triage in Medical LLMs Zhe Yu, Wenpeng Xing, Meng Han Hallucinations in medical large language models (LLMs) remain a safety-critical issue, particularly when available evidence is insufficient or conflicting. We study this problem in diabetic retinopathy (DR) decision settings and introduce RETINA-SAFE, an evidence-grounded benchmark aligned with retinal grading records, comprising 12,522 samples. RETINA-SAFE is organized into three evidence-relation tasks: E-Align (evidence-consistent), E-Conflict (evidence-conflicting), and E-Gap (evidence-insufficient). We further propose ECRT (Evidence-Conditioned Risk Triage), a two-stage white-box detection framework: Stage 1 performs Safe/Unsafe risk triage, and Stage 2 refines unsafe cases into contradiction-driven versus evidence-gap risks. ECRT leverages internal representation and logit shifts under CTX/NOCTX conditions, with class-balanced training for robust learning. Under evidence-grouped (not patient-disjoint) splits across multiple backbones, ECRT provides strong Stage-1 risk triage and explicit subtype attribution, improves Stage-1 balanced accuracy by +0.15 to +0.19 over external uncertainty and self-consistency baselines and by +0.02 to +0.07 over the strongest adapted supervised baseline, and consistently exceeds a single-stage white-box ablation on Stage-1 balanced accuracy. These findings support white-box internal signals grounded in retinal evidence as a practical route to interpretable medical LLM risk triage. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2604.05348 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2604.05348v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.05348 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Wenpeng Xing [view email] [v1] Tue, 7 Apr 2026 02:40:13 UTC (3,168 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-04 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Apr 08, 2026
    Archived
    Apr 08, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗