Pressure, What Pressure? Sycophancy Disentanglement in Language Models via Reward Decomposition
arXiv AIArchived Apr 08, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.05279v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models exhibit sycophancy, the tendency to shift their stated positions toward perceived user preferences or authority cues regardless of evidence. Standard alignment methods fail to correct this because scalar reward models conflate two distinct failure modes into a single signal: pressure capitulation, where the model changes a correct answer under social pressure, and evidence blindness, where the model ignores the provided contex
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 7 Apr 2026]
Pressure, What Pressure? Sycophancy Disentanglement in Language Models via Reward Decomposition
Muhammad Ahmed Mohsin, Ahsan Bilal, Muhammad Umer, Emily Fox
Large language models exhibit sycophancy, the tendency to shift their stated positions toward perceived user preferences or authority cues regardless of evidence. Standard alignment methods fail to correct this because scalar reward models conflate two distinct failure modes into a single signal: pressure capitulation, where the model changes a correct answer under social pressure, and evidence blindness, where the model ignores the provided context entirely. We operationalise sycophancy through formal definitions of pressure independence and evidence responsiveness, serving as a working framework for disentangled training rather than a definitive characterisation of the phenomenon. We propose the first approach to sycophancy reduction via reward decomposition, introducing a multi-component Group Relative Policy Optimisation (GRPO) reward that decomposes the training signal into five terms: pressure resistance, context fidelity, position consistency, agreement suppression, and factual correctness. We train using a contrastive dataset pairing pressure-free baselines with pressured variants across three authority levels and two opposing evidence contexts. Across five base models, our two-phase pipeline consistently reduces sycophancy on all metric axes, with ablations confirming that each reward term governs an independent behavioural dimension. The learned resistance to pressure generalises beyond our training methodology and prompt structure, reducing answer-priming sycophancy by up to 17 points on SycophancyEval despite the absence of such pressure forms during training.
Comments: Submitted to COLM 2026
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.05279 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2604.05279v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.05279
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Muhammad Ahmed Mohsin [view email]
[v1] Tue, 7 Apr 2026 00:28:17 UTC (321 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)