From Governance Norms to Enforceable Controls: A Layered Translation Method for Runtime Guardrails in Agentic AI
arXiv AIArchived Apr 08, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.05229v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic AI systems plan, use tools, maintain state, and produce multi-step trajectories with external effects. Those properties create a governance problem that differs materially from single-turn generative AI: important risks emerge dur- ing execution, not only at model development or deployment time. Governance standards such as ISO/IEC 42001, ISO/IEC 23894, ISO/IEC 42005, ISO/IEC 5338, ISO/IEC 38507, and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework ar
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 6 Apr 2026]
From Governance Norms to Enforceable Controls: A Layered Translation Method for Runtime Guardrails in Agentic AI
Christopher Koch
Agentic AI systems plan, use tools, maintain state, and produce multi-step trajectories with external effects. Those properties create a governance problem that differs materially from single-turn generative AI: important risks emerge dur- ing execution, not only at model development or deployment time. Governance standards such as ISO/IEC 42001, ISO/IEC 23894, ISO/IEC 42005, ISO/IEC 5338, ISO/IEC 38507, and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework are therefore highly relevant to agentic AI, but they do not by themselves yield implementable runtime guardrails. This paper proposes a layered translation method that connects standards-derived governance objectives to four control layers: governance objectives, design- time constraints, runtime mediation, and assurance feedback. It distinguishes governance objectives, technical controls, runtime guardrails, and assurance evidence; introduces a control tuple and runtime-enforceability rubric for layer assignment; and demonstrates the method in a procurement-agent case study. The central claim is modest: standards should guide control placement across architecture, runtime policy, human escalation, and audit, while runtime guardrails are reserved for controls that are observable, determinate, and time-sensitive enough to justify execution-time intervention.
Comments: 5 pages, 2 tables
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.05229 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2604.05229v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.05229
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Christopher Koch [view email]
[v1] Mon, 6 Apr 2026 22:49:28 UTC (11 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.HC
cs.LG
cs.MA
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)