CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Apr 08, 2026

Attribution Bias in Large Language Models

arXiv AI Archived Apr 08, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2604.05224v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to support search and information retrieval, it is critical that they accurately attribute content to its original authors. In this work, we introduce AttriBench, the first fame- and demographically-balanced quote attribution benchmark dataset. Through explicitly balancing author fame and demographics, AttriBench enables controlled investigation of demographic bias in quote attribution. Using th

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 6 Apr 2026] Attribution Bias in Large Language Models Eliza Berman, Bella Chang, Daniel B. Neill, Emily Black As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to support search and information retrieval, it is critical that they accurately attribute content to its original authors. In this work, we introduce AttriBench, the first fame- and demographically-balanced quote attribution benchmark dataset. Through explicitly balancing author fame and demographics, AttriBench enables controlled investigation of demographic bias in quote attribution. Using this dataset, we evaluate 11 widely used LLMs across different prompt settings and find that quote attribution remains a challenging task even for frontier models. We observe large and systematic disparities in attribution accuracy between race, gender, and intersectional groups. We further introduce and investigate suppression, a distinct failure mode in which models omit attribution entirely, even when the model has access to authorship information. We find that suppression is widespread and unevenly distributed across demographic groups, revealing systematic biases not captured by standard accuracy metrics. Our results position quote attribution as a benchmark for representational fairness in LLMs. Comments: 21 pages Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2604.05224 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2604.05224v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.05224 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Eliza Berman [view email] [v1] Mon, 6 Apr 2026 22:40:03 UTC (2,212 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-04 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Apr 08, 2026
    Archived
    Apr 08, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗