CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Apr 08, 2026

Hackers or Hallucinators? A Comprehensive Analysis of LLM-Based Automated Penetration Testing

arXiv Security Archived Apr 08, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2604.05719v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has created new opportunities for Automated Penetration Testing (AutoPT), spawning numerous frameworks aimed at achieving end-to-end autonomous attacks. However, despite the proliferation of related studies, existing research generally lacks systematic architectural analysis and large-scale empirical comparisons under a unified benchmark. Therefore, this paper presents the first Systematization

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 7 Apr 2026] Hackers or Hallucinators? A Comprehensive Analysis of LLM-Based Automated Penetration Testing Jiaren Peng, Zeqin Li, Chang You, Yan Wang, Hanlin Sun, Xuan Tian, Shuqiao Zhang, Junyi Liu, Jianguo Zhao, Renyang Liu, Haoran Ou, Yuqiang Sun, Jiancheng Zhang, Yutong Jiao, Kunshu Song, Chao Zhang, Fan Shi, Hongda Sun, Rui Yan, Cheng Huang The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has created new opportunities for Automated Penetration Testing (AutoPT), spawning numerous frameworks aimed at achieving end-to-end autonomous attacks. However, despite the proliferation of related studies, existing research generally lacks systematic architectural analysis and large-scale empirical comparisons under a unified benchmark. Therefore, this paper presents the first Systematization of Knowledge (SoK) focusing on the architectural design and comprehensive empirical evaluation of current LLM-based AutoPT frameworks. At systematization level, we comprehensively review existing framework designs across six dimensions: agent architecture, agent plan, agent memory, agent execution, external knowledge, and benchmarks. At empirical level, we conduct large-scale experiments on 13 representative open-source AutoPT frameworks and 2 baseline frameworks utilizing a unified benchmark. The experiments consumed over 10 billion tokens in total and generated more than 1,500 execution logs, which were manually reviewed and analyzed over four months by a panel of more than 15 researchers with expertise in cybersecurity. By investigating the latest progress in this rapidly developing field, we provide researchers with a structured taxonomy to understand existing LLM-based AutoPT frameworks and a large-scale empirical benchmark, along with promising directions for future research. Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Software Engineering (cs.SE) Cite as: arXiv:2604.05719 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2604.05719v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.05719 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Jiaren Peng [view email] [v1] Tue, 7 Apr 2026 11:19:16 UTC (3,348 KB) Access Paper: view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-04 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI cs.SE References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Apr 08, 2026
    Archived
    Apr 08, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗