Hackers or Hallucinators? A Comprehensive Analysis of LLM-Based Automated Penetration Testing
arXiv SecurityArchived Apr 08, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.05719v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has created new opportunities for Automated Penetration Testing (AutoPT), spawning numerous frameworks aimed at achieving end-to-end autonomous attacks. However, despite the proliferation of related studies, existing research generally lacks systematic architectural analysis and large-scale empirical comparisons under a unified benchmark. Therefore, this paper presents the first Systematization
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 7 Apr 2026]
Hackers or Hallucinators? A Comprehensive Analysis of LLM-Based Automated Penetration Testing
Jiaren Peng, Zeqin Li, Chang You, Yan Wang, Hanlin Sun, Xuan Tian, Shuqiao Zhang, Junyi Liu, Jianguo Zhao, Renyang Liu, Haoran Ou, Yuqiang Sun, Jiancheng Zhang, Yutong Jiao, Kunshu Song, Chao Zhang, Fan Shi, Hongda Sun, Rui Yan, Cheng Huang
The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has created new opportunities for Automated Penetration Testing (AutoPT), spawning numerous frameworks aimed at achieving end-to-end autonomous attacks. However, despite the proliferation of related studies, existing research generally lacks systematic architectural analysis and large-scale empirical comparisons under a unified benchmark. Therefore, this paper presents the first Systematization of Knowledge (SoK) focusing on the architectural design and comprehensive empirical evaluation of current LLM-based AutoPT frameworks. At systematization level, we comprehensively review existing framework designs across six dimensions: agent architecture, agent plan, agent memory, agent execution, external knowledge, and benchmarks. At empirical level, we conduct large-scale experiments on 13 representative open-source AutoPT frameworks and 2 baseline frameworks utilizing a unified benchmark. The experiments consumed over 10 billion tokens in total and generated more than 1,500 execution logs, which were manually reviewed and analyzed over four months by a panel of more than 15 researchers with expertise in cybersecurity. By investigating the latest progress in this rapidly developing field, we provide researchers with a structured taxonomy to understand existing LLM-based AutoPT frameworks and a large-scale empirical benchmark, along with promising directions for future research.
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Software Engineering (cs.SE)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.05719 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2604.05719v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.05719
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Jiaren Peng [view email]
[v1] Tue, 7 Apr 2026 11:19:16 UTC (3,348 KB)
Access Paper:
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
cs.SE
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)