CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Apr 07, 2026

Structured Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Large Language Models with Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and DualJudge

arXiv AI Archived Apr 07, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2604.03742v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Effective evaluation of large language models (LLMs) remains a critical bottleneck, as conventional direct scoring often yields inconsistent and opaque judgments. In this work, we adapt the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to LLM-based evaluation and, more importantly, propose a confidence-aware Fuzzy AHP (FAHP) extension that models epistemic uncertainty via triangular fuzzy numbers modulated by LLM-generated confidence scores. Systematically vali

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 4 Apr 2026] Structured Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Large Language Models with Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and DualJudge Yulong He, Ivan Smirnov, Dmitry Fedrushkov, Sergey Kovalchuk, Ilya Revin Effective evaluation of large language models (LLMs) remains a critical bottleneck, as conventional direct scoring often yields inconsistent and opaque judgments. In this work, we adapt the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to LLM-based evaluation and, more importantly, propose a confidence-aware Fuzzy AHP (FAHP) extension that models epistemic uncertainty via triangular fuzzy numbers modulated by LLM-generated confidence scores. Systematically validated on JudgeBench, our structured approach decomposes assessments into explicit criteria and incorporates uncertainty-aware aggregation, producing more calibrated judgments. Extensive experiments demonstrate that both crisp and fuzzy AHP consistently outperform direct scoring across model scales and dataset splits, with FAHP showing superior stability in uncertain comparison scenarios. Building on these insights, we propose \textbf{DualJudge}, a hybrid framework inspired by Dual-Process Theory that adaptively fuses holistic direct scores with structured AHP outputs via consistency-aware weighting. DualJudge achieves state-of-the-art performance, underscoring the complementary strengths of intuitive and deliberative evaluation paradigms. These results establish uncertainty-aware structured reasoning as a principled pathway toward more reliable LLM assessment. Code is available at this https URL. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2604.03742 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2604.03742v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.03742 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Yulong He [view email] [v1] Sat, 4 Apr 2026 14:07:37 UTC (3,854 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-04 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Apr 07, 2026
    Archived
    Apr 07, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗