CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Apr 07, 2026

Entropy and Attention Dynamics in Small Language Models: A Trace-Level Structural Analysis on the TruthfulQA Benchmark

arXiv AI Archived Apr 07, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2604.03589v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Small language models (SLMs) have been increasingly deployed in edge devices and other resource-constrained settings. However, these models make confident mispredictions and produce unstable output, making them risky for factual and decision-critical tasks. Current evaluation methodology relies on final accuracy or hallucination rates without explaining how internal model behavior affects outputs. Specifically, how entropy evolves during decoding,

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 4 Apr 2026] Entropy and Attention Dynamics in Small Language Models: A Trace-Level Structural Analysis on the TruthfulQA Benchmark Adeyemi Adeseye, Aisvarya Adeseye, Hannu Tenhunen, Jouni Isoaho Small language models (SLMs) have been increasingly deployed in edge devices and other resource-constrained settings. However, these models make confident mispredictions and produce unstable output, making them risky for factual and decision-critical tasks. Current evaluation methodology relies on final accuracy or hallucination rates without explaining how internal model behavior affects outputs. Specifically, how entropy evolves during decoding, how attention is distributed across layers, and how hidden representations contribute to uncertainty, logical inconsistencies, and misinformation propagation are often overlooked. Consequently, this study introduces a trace-level analysis of entropy and attention dynamics in SLMs evaluated with the TruthfulQA dataset. Four models with parameter ranges of 1B-1.7B parameters were examined via token-level output entropy, attention entropy, head dispersion, and hidden-state representation. The results reflect three model classifications by entropy patterns. Deterministic models (DeepSeek-1.5B and LLaMA-1B): output entropy decreases over time. Exploratory models (Gemma-1B): with increasing entropy, and balanced models (Qwen-1.7B): have moderate and stable entropy. Also, each group has distinctively different hidden-state movement and attention dispersion patterns. The analysis demonstrates that truthfulness in SLMs emerges from structured entropy and attention dynamics. Monitoring and optimizing these internal uncertainty patterns can guide the design of a more reliable, hallucination-aware, and application-specific edge SLMs. Comments: Accepted to Publish it in 12th Intelligent Systems Conference 2026, 3-4 September 2026 in Amsterdam, The Netherlands Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2604.03589 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2604.03589v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.03589 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Aisvarya Adeseye Mrs [view email] [v1] Sat, 4 Apr 2026 04:35:20 UTC (4,736 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-04 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Apr 07, 2026
    Archived
    Apr 07, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗