AutoVerifier: An Agentic Automated Verification Framework Using Large Language Models
arXiv SecurityArchived Apr 06, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.02617v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Scientific and Technical Intelligence (S&TI) analysis requires verifying complex technical claims across rapidly growing literature, where existing approaches fail to bridge the verification gap between surface-level accuracy and deeper methodological validity. We present AutoVerifier, an LLM-based agentic framework that automates end-to-end verification of technical claims without requiring domain expertise. AutoVerifier decomposes every technic
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 3 Apr 2026]
AutoVerifier: An Agentic Automated Verification Framework Using Large Language Models
Yuntao Du, Minh Dinh, Kaiyuan Zhang, Ninghui Li
Scientific and Technical Intelligence (S&TI) analysis requires verifying complex technical claims across rapidly growing literature, where existing approaches fail to bridge the verification gap between surface-level accuracy and deeper methodological validity. We present AutoVerifier, an LLM-based agentic framework that automates end-to-end verification of technical claims without requiring domain expertise. AutoVerifier decomposes every technical assertion into structured claim triples of the form (Subject, Predicate, Object), constructing knowledge graphs that enable structured reasoning across six progressively enriching layers: corpus construction and ingestion, entity and claim extraction, intra-document verification, cross-source verification, external signal corroboration, and final hypothesis matrix generation. We demonstrate AutoVerifier on a contested quantum computing claim, where the framework, operated by analysts with no quantum expertise, automatically identified overclaims and metric inconsistencies within the target paper, traced cross-source contradictions, uncovered undisclosed commercial conflicts of interest, and produced a final assessment. These results show that structured LLM verification can reliably evaluate the validity and maturity of emerging technologies, turning raw technical documents into traceable, evidence-backed intelligence assessments.
Comments: Winner of 2025-2026 Radiance Technologies Innovation Bowl
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Social and Information Networks (cs.SI)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.02617 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2604.02617v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.02617
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Yuntao Du [view email]
[v1] Fri, 3 Apr 2026 01:11:43 UTC (20 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CR
cs.IR
cs.LG
cs.SI
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)